## Adopting Full Dollarization in Postconflict Economies: Would the Gains Compensate for the Losses in Liberia?

_IMF Working Papers, March 1, 2006_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Adopting Full Dollarization in Postconflict Economies: Would the Gains Compensate for the Losses in Liberia?](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/adopting-full-dollarization-in-postconflict-economies-would-the-gains-compensate-for-the-18880)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/adopting-full-dollarization-in-postconflict-economies-would-the-gains-compensate-for-the-18880/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/adopting-full-dollarization-in-postconflict-economies-would-the-gains-compensate-for-the-18880/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/adopting-full-dollarization-in-postconflict-economies-would-the-gains-compensate-for-the-18880/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Liliana B Schumacher, Jiro Honda
- Published: March 1, 2006
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451863420.001

---

### Summary and conclusion
- This paper discusses whether adopting the U.S. dollar as the sole legal tender could help Liberia, a postconflict economy, to boost growth and strengthen fiscal discipline.
- Conclusion: Liberia should not adopt full dollarization for the following reasons:
  - (i) the alleged benefits voiced by the proponents of dollarization, in terms of enhanced fiscal discipline and faster economic growth, are not supported by the empirical evidence;
  - (ii) dollarization would increase the Liberian economy's vulnerability to external shocks and Liberia's social fragility;
  - (iii) banks in fully dollarized economies face additional capitalization requirements that Liberian banks cannot meet at present; and
  - (iv) dollarization would be costly in terms of real resources because of the loss of seigniorage.

### Major findings and analysis
- Empirical evidence does not support claims that full dollarization yields enhanced fiscal discipline.
- Empirical evidence does not support claims that full dollarization produces faster economic growth.
- Full dollarization would raise vulnerability to external shocks and exacerbate social fragility in Liberia.
- Banking sector implications: fully dollarized regimes impose additional capitalization requirements that Liberian banks cannot meet at present.
- Fiscal/resource cost: loss of seigniorage would be a costly real-resource implication of dollarization.

### Subject and keywords
- Subject: Banking, Currencies, Dollarization, Exchange rate arrangements, Government asset and liability management
- Keywords: deutsche mark, dollarization debate, dollarization regime, exchange rate, foreign exchange, full dollarization, WP

*Source: IMF Working Papers landing page for "Adopting Full Dollarization in Postconflict Economies: Would the Gains Compensate for the Losses in Liberia?"*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp0682**
  - [_wp0682 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0682.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp0682 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp0682.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/adopting-full-dollarization-in-postconflict-economies-would-the-gains-compensate-for-the-18880_