## China: Does Government Health and Education Spending Boost Consumption?

_IMF Working Papers, January 1, 2010_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [China: Does Government Health and Education Spending Boost Consumption?](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/china-does-government-health-and-education-spending-boost-consumption-23533)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/china-does-government-health-and-education-spending-boost-consumption-23533/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/china-does-government-health-and-education-spending-boost-consumption-23533/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/china-does-government-health-and-education-spending-boost-consumption-23533/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Steven A Barnett, R. Brooks
- Published: January 1, 2010
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451962130.001

---

### Summary and research question
- Consumption in China is described as unusually low and has continued to decline as a share of GDP over the past decade.
- The paper investigates whether the sizable increase in government social spending in recent years lowered precautionary saving and increased consumption.
- The study focuses on government spending on health and education and its impact on household behavior and aggregate consumption.

### Main findings
- Spending on health, but not education, had an impact on household behavior.
- The impact of government health spending is reported as large:
  - A one yuan increase in government health spending is associated with a two yuan increase in urban household consumption.
- Education spending showed no measurable effect on household consumption in the analysis presented.

### Policy implications and interpretation
- Increasing government health spending can significantly reduce precautionary saving and boost urban household consumption, suggesting a channel for rebalancing growth away from reliance on exports and investment toward consumption.
- Education spending, according to the paper's findings, does not appear to have the same effect on household consumption and therefore may not serve the same short-term demand-stimulating role.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Wp1016**
  - [Wp1016 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/_wp1016.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Wp1016 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/_wp1016.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/china-does-government-health-and-education-spending-boost-consumption-23533_