## Fiscal Policy over the Election Cycle in Low-Income Countries

_IMF Working Papers, June 26, 2013_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Fiscal Policy over the Election Cycle in Low-Income Countries](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/fiscal-policy-over-the-election-cycle-in-low-income-countries-40710)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/fiscal-policy-over-the-election-cycle-in-low-income-countries-40710/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/fiscal-policy-over-the-election-cycle-in-low-income-countries-40710/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/fiscal-policy-over-the-election-cycle-in-low-income-countries-40710/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Christian H Ebeke, Dilan Ölcer
- Published: June 26, 2013
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475588514.001

---

### Summary and main findings
- Focus: Low-Income Countries (LICs); investigation of fiscal-variable behavior during and after elections.
- During election years:
  - Government consumption significantly increases.
  - Higher fiscal deficits result from increased government consumption.
- During the two years following elections:
  - Fiscal adjustment occurs through increased revenue mobilization in trade taxes.
  - Cuts are concentrated in government investment.
  - No significant cuts in government consumption are observed.
- Institutional mitigants:
  - The presence of fiscal rules helps dampen the magnitude of the political budget cycle in LICs.
  - IMF programs also help dampen the magnitude of the political budget cycle in LICs.
- Conclusion: Elections imply a macroeconomic cost when they take place and trigger a subsequent fiscal adjustment in which public investment is largely sacrificed.

### Data, scope, and methods (as reported)
- New dataset used on national fiscal rules and IMF programs to assess their moderating effects on political budget cycles.
- Geographic focus includes Sub-Saharan Africa among LICs (as indicated in keywords).

### Policy implications and recommendations (as reported)
- Strengthening or maintaining fiscal rules can reduce the magnitude of election-driven fiscal expansions.
- Engagement with IMF programs can help dampen political budget cycles.
- Attention needed to protect public investment during post-election fiscal adjustments to avoid long-term growth costs.

### Publication and metadata
- Authors: Christian H Ebeke, Dilan Ölcer
- Publication date: June 26, 2013
- Series: Working Paper No. 2013/153
- Issue: 153
- Volume: 2013
- Pages: 24
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475588514.001
- Stock No: WPIEA2013153
- ISBN: 9781475588514
- ISSN: 1018-5941
- Preview citation format provided: Christian H Ebeke, and Dilan Ölcer. "Fiscal Policy over the Election Cycle in Low-Income Countries", IMF Working Papers 2013, 153 (2013), accessed 9/9/2026, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475588514.001

*IMF Working Paper — Fiscal Policy over the Election Cycle in Low-Income Countries*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Wp13153**
  - [Wp13153 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13153.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Wp13153 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13153.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/fiscal-policy-over-the-election-cycle-in-low-income-countries-40710_