## Garbage In, Gospel Out? Controlling for the Underreporting of Remittances

_IMF Working Papers, September 1, 2008_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Garbage In, Gospel Out? Controlling for the Underreporting of Remittances](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/garbage-in-gospel-out-controlling-for-the-underreporting-of-remittances-22329)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/garbage-in-gospel-out-controlling-for-the-underreporting-of-remittances-22329/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/garbage-in-gospel-out-controlling-for-the-underreporting-of-remittances-22329/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/garbage-in-gospel-out-controlling-for-the-underreporting-of-remittances-22329/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Tigran A. Melkonyan, David A. Grigorian, J. Scott Shonkwiler
- Published: September 1, 2008
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451870886.001

---

### Summary
- Authors: Tigran A. Melkonyan, David A. Grigorian, J. Scott Shonkwiler
- Date: September 1, 2008
- Core question: How do reporting/measurement errors in self-reported remittance data affect empirical estimates of remittances' impact on microeconomic incentives?
- Main contribution: Develops an econometric procedure to control for reporting/measurement errors in remittance data and applies it to household-level data from Armenia.

### Methodology and Data
- Approach: An econometric procedure to control for reporting/measurement errors in self-reported remittance variables.
- Application: Household-level data from Armenia.
- Emphasis: Accounting for systematic under-reporting in remittances before estimating behavioral effects (in particular, incentives to work).

### Key Findings
- Evidence of systematic under-reporting of remittances in self-reported household data.
- After controlling for reporting/measurement errors, the estimated impact of remittances on labor incentives changes materially:
  - Finding: A strong negative impact of remittances on incentives to work.

### Policy and Analytical Implications
- Empirical analyses using self-reported remittance measures should control for measurement/reporting error before drawing behavioral or policy conclusions.
- Failure to account for under-reporting can bias estimates of remittances' effects on labor supply and related microeconomic incentives.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **PDP-Working Paper**
  - [PDP-Working Paper (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp08230.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [PDP-Working Paper (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp08230.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/garbage-in-gospel-out-controlling-for-the-underreporting-of-remittances-22329_