## Is Exchange Rate Stabilization an Appropriate Cure for the Dutch Disease?

_IMF Working Papers, August 1, 2010_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Is Exchange Rate Stabilization an Appropriate Cure for the Dutch Disease?](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/is-exchange-rate-stabilization-an-appropriate-cure-for-the-dutch-disease-24122)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/is-exchange-rate-stabilization-an-appropriate-cure-for-the-dutch-disease-24122/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/is-exchange-rate-stabilization-an-appropriate-cure-for-the-dutch-disease-24122/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/is-exchange-rate-stabilization-an-appropriate-cure-for-the-dutch-disease-24122/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Juan Pablo Medina Guzman, Ruy Lama
- Published: August 1, 2010
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455202164.001

---

### Summary
- This paper evaluates how successful is a policy of exchange rate stabilization to counteract the negative effects of a Dutch Disease episode.
- The authors consider a small open economy model that incorporates nominal rigidities and a learning-by-doing externality in the tradable sector.
- Principal conclusion: leaning against an appreciated exchange rate can prevent an inefficient loss of tradable output but at the cost of generating a misallocation of resources in other sectors of the economy.
- The paper also finds that welfare is a decreasing function of exchange rate intervention.
- Policy implication stated: stabilizing the nominal exchange rate in response to a Dutch Disease episode is highly distortionary.

### Key Findings
- Exchange rate intervention can prevent inefficient loss of tradable output.
- Exchange rate intervention generates misallocation of resources in non-tradable and other sectors.
- Welfare is a decreasing function of exchange rate intervention, indicating welfare losses with stronger stabilization.

### Model and Mechanisms (as described)
- Framework: small open economy model.
- Frictions included: nominal rigidities.
- Externality included: learning-by-doing externality in the tradable sector.
- Trade-off highlighted: preserving tradable output versus distorting resource allocation elsewhere.

### Policy Recommendations and Implications
- Exchange rate stabilization as a response to Dutch Disease episodes is not welfare-improving according to the model results.
- Policymakers should account for the distortionary effects and welfare-reducing outcomes when considering nominal exchange rate stabilization to counteract Dutch Disease.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp10182**
  - [_wp10182 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/_wp10182.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp10182 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/_wp10182.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/is-exchange-rate-stabilization-an-appropriate-cure-for-the-dutch-disease-24122_