## J-Curve of Productivity and Growth: Indian Manufacturing Post-Liberalization

_IMF Working Papers, July 1, 2011_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [J-Curve of Productivity and Growth: Indian Manufacturing Post-Liberalization](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/j-curve-of-productivity-and-growth-indian-manufacturing-post-liberalization-25029)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/j-curve-of-productivity-and-growth-indian-manufacturing-post-liberalization-25029/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/j-curve-of-productivity-and-growth-indian-manufacturing-post-liberalization-25029/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/j-curve-of-productivity-and-growth-indian-manufacturing-post-liberalization-25029/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Arvind Virmani, Danish A Hashim
- Published: July 1, 2011
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455298730.001

---

### Overview
- Title: J-Curve of Productivity and Growth: Indian Manufacturing Post-Liberalization
- Authors: Arvind Virmani, Danish A Hashim
- Publication date: July 1, 2011
- Series: Working Paper No. 2011/163
- Issue: 163

### Main findings
- Most estimates of Indian manufacturing productivity find a slowdown in the 1990s.
- This slowdown is puzzling because 1990s reforms were deeper and wider than the 1980s reforms that raised the growth rate of the Indian economy by 2 per cent points.
- The paper tests the hypothesis of the J curve of Productivity and Growth following major liberalization and finds it to be broadly supported by the data.
- Mechanisms identified as producing negative effects on measured productivity:
  - Technological obsolescence
  - Gradual adoption of new technology
  - Learning by doing

### Interpretation and implications
- The J-curve hypothesis: major liberalization can lead to an initial decline in measured productivity before gains materialize, due to the combined effects of obsolescence, adoption lags, and learning processes.
- Measured productivity can decline even as longer-term growth-enhancing forces from reforms are present, implying timing and measurement issues are critical for assessing reform outcomes.

### Subject areas and keywords
- Subject: Economic sectors, Labor, Manufacturing, Production, Production growth, Productivity, Total factor productivity
- Keywords: aggregate manufacturing, capital goods, capital stock, cotton textiles consumer products, Economic reforms, fixed capital, Global, Indian manufacturing, industry composition, J-curve hypothesis, Manufacturing, output growth, petroleum product, petroleum refinery, petroleum refinery industry, plastic product, private sector, Production growth, Productivity, productivity & output growth, productivity differential, productivity growth, productivity slowdown, productivity spurt, productivity-enhancing effect, services productivity, technology-productivity incentive, Total factor productivity, WP

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp11163**
  - [_wp11163 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11163.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp11163 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/_wp11163.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/j-curve-of-productivity-and-growth-indian-manufacturing-post-liberalization-25029_
