## Regional Economic Disparities in Australia

_IMF Working Papers, August 1, 2004_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Regional Economic Disparities in Australia](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/regional-economic-disparities-in-australia-17615)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/regional-economic-disparities-in-australia-17615/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/regional-economic-disparities-in-australia-17615/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/regional-economic-disparities-in-australia-17615/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Uma Ramakrishnan, Martin D. Cerisola
- Published: August 1, 2004
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451856477.001

---

### Summary
- Australia's remarkable economic performance during the 1990s has not produced significant convergence of real per capita income, output, and employment levels across states and territories.
- The paper examines economic rigidities that may have contributed to the lack of convergence, focusing on labor-market rigidities and the structure of federal government transfers to households and subnational governments.
- Key analytical conclusion: the wage awards system has limited the adjustment of real wages to productivity differentials, and federal transfers to households have potentially reduced work incentives in high-unemployment states by limiting labor force participation.

### Findings on regional outcomes
- No significant convergence in:
  - real per capita income
  - output
  - employment levels
- Higher unemployment rates in some states associated with constrained wage adjustment mechanisms.
- Federal government transfers to households appear to have adversely affected work incentives in high unemployment states by limiting participation in the labor force.

### Analysis of economic rigidities
- Wage awards system:
  - Restricted adjustment of real wages to productivity differentials.
  - Contributed to higher unemployment rates in some states.
- Federal government transfers:
  - Transfers to households may limit labor force participation in high-unemployment states.
  - Structure of transfers to subnational governments also examined as a potential rigidity affecting regional adjustment.

### Policy implications and recommendations
- Address labor-market rigidities that prevent real wage adjustment to productivity differentials to reduce unemployment disparities across states.
- Reassess the design of federal government transfers to households to avoid creating adverse work incentives in high-unemployment states.
- Consider reforms to the structure of transfers to subnational governments to improve regional convergence dynamics.

*IMF Working Paper by Uma Ramakrishnan and Martin D. Cerisola, August 1, 2004; 23 pages; Working Paper No. 2004/144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451856477.001*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp04144**
  - [_wp04144 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/_wp04144.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp04144 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/_wp04144.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/regional-economic-disparities-in-australia-17615_