{
  "title": "Stochastic Trends, Debt Sustainability and Fiscal Policy",
  "publication": "IMF Working Papers, March 10, 2016",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/index.md",
  "summary": "We study empirically the reaction of fiscal policy to changes in the permanent and transitory components of GDP in a panel of countries. We find evidence that government spending tends to be counter-cyclical conditional on temporary shocks and pro-cyclical conditional on permanent shocks.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Summary",
      "content": "- Study objective: Empirically assess the reaction of fiscal policy to changes in the permanent and transitory components of GDP in a panel of countries.\n- Main empirical findings:\n  - Government spending tends to be counter-cyclical conditional on temporary shocks.\n  - Government spending tends to be pro-cyclical conditional on permanent shocks.\n  - No evidence that developing countries are systematically different from developed ones in terms of fiscal policy.\n- Theoretical contribution: A theory featuring a fiscal reaction function to the output gap and a measure of debt sustainability.\n- Fiscal impulse responses:\n  - Response to a permanent shock to GDP: positive (effect on debt sustainability dominates).\n  - Response to a temporary shock to GDP: negative (effect on current output gap dominates)."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Empirical findings and interpretation",
      "content": "- Fiscal cyclicality:\n  - Counter-cyclical response when shocks are transitory.\n  - Pro-cyclical response when shocks are permanent.\n- Cross-country patterns:\n  - No systematic distinction between developing and developed countries in fiscal reaction patterns reported.\n- Key conceptual link:\n  - The sign and magnitude of fiscal responses depend on whether the shock affects debt sustainability more strongly (favors positive response) or the current output gap more strongly (favors negative response)."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Theoretical framework",
      "content": "- Core elements:\n  - Fiscal reaction function that responds to the output gap.\n  - Incorporated measure of debt sustainability that influences fiscal decisions.\n- Mechanism:\n  - A permanent positive GDP shock improves debt sustainability, inducing a positive fiscal impulse (higher spending).\n  - A temporary positive GDP shock reduces the current output gap pressure, inducing a negative fiscal impulse (lower spending)."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Sensitivities and robustness",
      "content": "- Results are mostly sensitive to:\n  - The relative weight of debt sustainability in the fiscal reaction function.\n  - The extent of real rigidities in the economy.\n- Implication: Policy conclusions depend critically on how policymakers trade off debt sustainability versus output gap stabilization and on structural features affecting the transmission of shocks."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Publication and metadata",
      "content": "- Authors: Karim Barhoumi, Reda Cherif, Nooman Rebei\n- Date: March 10, 2016\n- Series: Working Paper No. 2016/059\n- Volume: 2016\n- Issue: 059\n- Pages: 45\n- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513574677.001\n- Stock No: WPIEA2016059\n- ISBN: 9781513574677\n- ISSN: 1018-5941\n\nStochastic Trends, Debt Sustainability and Fiscal Policy — IMF Working Paper by Karim Barhoumi, Reda Cherif, and Nooman Rebei (March 10, 2016).\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Wp1659\n  - Wp1659 (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Wp1659 (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: Karim Barhoumi, Reda Cherif, Nooman Rebei",
    "Published: March 10, 2016",
    "Series: IMF Working Papers",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513574677.001",
    "Study objective: Empirically assess the reaction of fiscal policy to changes in the permanent and transitory components of GDP in a panel of countries.",
    "Main empirical findings:",
    "Theoretical contribution: A theory featuring a fiscal reaction function to the output gap and a measure of debt sustainability.",
    "Fiscal impulse responses:",
    "Fiscal cyclicality:",
    "Cross-country patterns:",
    "Key conceptual link:",
    "Core elements:",
    "Mechanism:",
    "Results are mostly sensitive to:",
    "Implication: Policy conclusions depend critically on how policymakers trade off debt sustainability versus output gap stabilization and on structural features affecting the transmission of shocks.",
    "Authors: Karim Barhoumi, Reda Cherif, Nooman Rebei",
    "Date: March 10, 2016",
    "Series: Working Paper No. 2016/059",
    "Volume: 2016",
    "Issue: 059",
    "Pages: 45",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513574677.001",
    "Stock No: WPIEA2016059",
    "ISBN: 9781513574677",
    "ISSN: 1018-5941",
    "**Wp1659**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Wp1659",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/_wp1659.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/_wp1659.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/_wp1659.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/stochastic-trends-debt-sustainability-and-fiscal-policy-43783/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-18T05:56:37.003Z"
}