## Sudden stops, time inconsistency, and the duration of sovereign debt

_IMF Working Papers, July 19, 2013_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Sudden stops, time inconsistency, and the duration of sovereign debt](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/sudden-stops-time-inconsistency-and-the-duration-of-sovereign-debt-40805)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/sudden-stops-time-inconsistency-and-the-duration-of-sovereign-debt-40805/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/sudden-stops-time-inconsistency-and-the-duration-of-sovereign-debt-40805/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/sudden-stops-time-inconsistency-and-the-duration-of-sovereign-debt-40805/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Juan Carlos Hatchondo, Leonardo Martinez
- Published: July 19, 2013
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475586176.001

---

### Overview
- Study context: sovereign debt duration chosen by the government within a standard model of sovereign default.
- Government trade-off examined:
  - Increase duration of debt to mitigate rollover risk.
  - Lower duration to mitigate the debt dilution problem.

### Main findings
- When the government decides the debt duration on a sequential basis, sudden stop risk increases the average duration by 1 year.
- Time inconsistency result: governments would like to commit to a duration that is 1.7 years shorter than the one they choose when decisions are made sequentially.

### Mechanisms and trade-offs
- Rollover risk: longer-duration debt reduces the probability and impact of rollover crises (sudden stops).
- Debt dilution problem: longer maturity increases the dilution of existing debt claims, creating incentives to shorten duration.
- Sequential decision-making amplifies sudden-stop considerations, leading to longer chosen durations relative to a commitment benchmark.

### Implications for sovereign debt management
- Sudden-stop risk can bias sequential decision-making toward longer maturities by an exact margin of 1 year.
- Commitment mechanisms that credibly shorten chosen duration by 1.7 years relative to sequential choices could mitigate time inconsistency and reduce debt dilution concerns.

*Source: Sudden stops, time inconsistency, and the duration of sovereign debt, Juan Carlos Hatchondo and Leonardo Martinez, July 19, 2013.*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp13174**
  - [_wp13174 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13174.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp13174 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13174.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/sudden-stops-time-inconsistency-and-the-duration-of-sovereign-debt-40805_
