## The ECB’s Monetary Analysis Revisited

_IMF Working Papers, July 1, 2008_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [The ECB’s Monetary Analysis Revisited](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-ecbs-monetary-analysis-revisited-22106)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-ecbs-monetary-analysis-revisited-22106/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-ecbs-monetary-analysis-revisited-22106/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-ecbs-monetary-analysis-revisited-22106/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Helge Berger, Thomas Harjes, Emil Stavrev
- Published: July 1, 2008
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451870299.001

---

### Summary
- Monetary aggregates continue to play an important role in the ECB's policy strategy.
- The paper revisits the case for money by surveying the ongoing theoretical and empirical debate.
- Key conclusion: an exclusive focus on non-monetary factors alone may leave the ECB with an incomplete picture of the economy.
- Treating monetary factors as a separate matter is characterized as a second-best solution.
- The paper proposes a general-equilibrium inspired analytical framework that merges the economic and monetary "pillars" of the ECB's policy strategy as the most promising way forward.
- Within such a unified framework, the role played by monetary aggregates may be rather limited.
- An integrated framework would facilitate the presentation of policy decisions by providing a clearer narrative of the relative role of money in interaction with other economic and financial sector variables, including asset prices, and their impact on consumer prices.

### Findings and analysis
- Monetary aggregates retain importance within the ECB’s strategy despite debates in theory and empirics.
- Exclusive emphasis on non-monetary indicators risks an incomplete assessment of economic conditions.
- Separating monetary analysis into an independent pillar is viewed as second-best compared to integration.
- A general-equilibrium inspired merger of the ECB’s economic and monetary pillars is advocated to:
  - Better integrate monetary and non-monetary drivers of inflation and economic activity.
  - Clarify the relative contributions of money, asset prices, and other financial variables to consumer prices.
- The practical quantitative contribution of monetary aggregates within the unified framework may be limited, but the analytical and communicative benefits are emphasized.

### Policy implications and recommendations
- Move from a two-pillar presentation (separate economic and monetary analyses) toward an integrated, general-equilibrium informed framework.
- Use the integrated framework to:
  - Provide a clearer narrative for policy decisions.
  - Highlight the interaction between monetary aggregates and other economic and financial sector variables, including asset prices.
  - Improve the assessment of likely impacts on consumer prices.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Wp08171**
  - [Wp08171 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp08171.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Wp08171 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/_wp08171.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-ecbs-monetary-analysis-revisited-22106_