## The Incidence and Effectiveness of Prior Actions in IMF-supported Programs

_IMF Working Papers, September 1, 2006_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [The Incidence and Effectiveness of Prior Actions in IMF-supported Programs](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-incidence-and-effectiveness-of-prior-actions-in-imf-supported-programs-19524)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-incidence-and-effectiveness-of-prior-actions-in-imf-supported-programs-19524/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-incidence-and-effectiveness-of-prior-actions-in-imf-supported-programs-19524/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-incidence-and-effectiveness-of-prior-actions-in-imf-supported-programs-19524/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Uma Ramakrishnan, Alun H. Thomas
- Published: September 1, 2006
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451864731.001

---

### Purpose and scope
- Prior actions are measures that need to be implemented prior to Board approval of an IMF-supported program.
- The paper examines whether prior actions can signal a willingness to implement reforms, especially when the member's track record is weak.
- Focus includes programs supported by the General Resources Account (GRA) and assessment of signaling, screening, macroeconomic target strengthening, and medium-term growth effects.

### Main findings
- There is some support for a signaling role of prior actions, particularly for programs supported by the General Resources Account (GRA).
- Controlling for the member's previous track record, prior actions are associated with greater compliance with other structural conditions, suggesting possible use as a screening device.
- Prior actions set at program approval serve as a useful screening device and strengthen the macroeconomic targets set out in the IMF-supported program.
- The growth impact analysis shows a demonstrable screening effect on growth over the medium term:
  - The growth impact of the ratio of prior actions at the outset versus the rest of the program is significantly positive.
  - The total number of prior actions is not statistically significant for growth.

### Policy implications and interpretation
- Prior actions can be used to screen program applicants and identify governments more likely to comply with program conditions.
- Setting prior actions at program approval may strengthen credibility of macroeconomic targets in IMF-supported programs.
- Emphasis on the ratio of front-loaded prior actions (at the outset) as a relevant metric for medium-term growth outcomes, rather than the total count of prior actions.

### Subjects and keywords
- Subjects: Budget planning and preparation; Fiscal stance; Inflation; Public expenditure review; Real exchange rates
- Keywords: government; IMF effort; IMF's program conditionality; program; program implementation; WP

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp06213**
  - [_wp06213 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp06213.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp06213 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/_wp06213.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/the-incidence-and-effectiveness-of-prior-actions-in-imf-supported-programs-19524_