## This Time They Are Different: Heterogeneity and Nonlinearity in the Relationship Between Debt and Growth

_IMF Working Papers, December 17, 2013_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [This Time They Are Different: Heterogeneity and Nonlinearity in the Relationship Between Debt and Growth](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/this-time-they-are-different-heterogeneity-and-nonlinearity-in-the-relationship-between-debt-41142)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/this-time-they-are-different-heterogeneity-and-nonlinearity-in-the-relationship-between-debt-41142/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/this-time-they-are-different-heterogeneity-and-nonlinearity-in-the-relationship-between-debt-41142/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/this-time-they-are-different-heterogeneity-and-nonlinearity-in-the-relationship-between-debt-41142/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Markus Eberhardt, Andrea F Presbitero
- Published: December 17, 2013
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484309285.001

---

### Study objective and methodological approach
- Objective: Study the long-run relationship between public debt and growth in a large panel of countries.
- Analytical emphasis:
  - Take particular note of theoretical arguments and data considerations in modeling the debt–growth relationship as heterogeneous across countries.
  - Investigate nonlinearities (debt thresholds) in both the cross-country and within-country dimensions.
  - Employ novel methods and diagnostics from the time-series literature adapted for use in the panel.
- Keywords and technical terms used in the analysis: asymmetric ARDL, common factor model, debt coefficient, GDP ratio, linear regression, nonlinearity.

### Key findings
- There is some support for a nonlinear relationship between debt and long-run growth across countries.
- There is no evidence for common debt thresholds within countries over time.
- Emphasis on heterogeneity: the debt–growth relationship should be modeled as heterogeneous across countries rather than assumed homogeneous.

### Analytical implications (from the paper’s results)
- Cross-country analyses: nonlinearities (debt thresholds) can be present across countries, implying that average or pooled estimates may mask important nonlinearity across different country contexts.
- Within-country analyses: absence of common debt thresholds over time suggests that a single universal threshold applicable to every country-period is not supported by the evidence presented.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **_wp13248**
  - [_wp13248 (Markdown version)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13248.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [_wp13248 (PDF)](/-/media/websites/imf/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/_wp13248.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2016/12/31/this-time-they-are-different-heterogeneity-and-nonlinearity-in-the-relationship-between-debt-41142_