{
  "title": "Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics",
  "publication": "IMF Working Papers, June 15, 2018",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/index.md",
  "summary": "In this paper, we undertake empirical analysis to understand U.S. wage behavior since the beginning of the new millennium. At the macroeconomic level, we find that a productivity-augmented Phillips curve model explains the data fairly well.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Summary and central findings",
      "content": "- The paper undertakes empirical analysis of U.S. wage behavior since the beginning of the new millennium.\n- A productivity-augmented Phillips curve model \"explains the data fairly well.\"\n- The model shows that upward pressure on wage growth from recent tightening in the labor market has been dampened by:\n  - a persistent decline in trend labor productivity growth; and\n  - a persistent decline in the share of income that accrues to labor.\n- Microeconomic evidence complements the macro findings:\n  - Lower regional unemployment puts upward pressure on individual wages, although this effect \"has become weaker since 2008.\"\n  - Downward pressure on wages is associated with:\n    - occupations exposed to automation and offshoring; and\n    - industries with a higher concentration of large firms.\n- The authors conclude that multiple factors jointly contribute to the observed moderation in wage growth, making it difficult to single out any one culprit."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Empirical themes and mechanisms",
      "content": "- Macro mechanism:\n  - Productivity-augmented Phillips curve captures interaction between labor market tightness and productivity/share-of-income trends.\n- Micro mechanisms:\n  - Regional unemployment → individual wage pressure (weaker post-2008).\n  - Occupational exposure to automation/offshoring → downward wage pressure.\n  - Industry concentration (higher share of large firms) → downward wage pressure."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Policy-relevant implications (as presented)",
      "content": "- Recent labor market tightening alone does not fully translate into stronger wage growth because of offsetting declines in trend productivity growth and labor’s income share.\n- Addressing wage growth moderation likely requires attention to:\n  - reversing or mitigating declines in trend labor productivity growth; and\n  - factors affecting the labor share of income.\n- Micro-level frictions—automation/offshoring exposure and industry concentration—are important channels shaping wage dynamics and may require targeted policy responses.\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics, WP/18/138, June 2018\n  - Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics, WP/18/138, June 2018 (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics, WP/18/138, June 2018 (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: Yasser Abdih, Stephan Danninger",
    "Published: June 15, 2018",
    "Series: IMF Working Papers",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484362082.001",
    "The paper undertakes empirical analysis of U.S. wage behavior since the beginning of the new millennium.",
    "A productivity-augmented Phillips curve model \"explains the data fairly well.\"",
    "The model shows that upward pressure on wage growth from recent tightening in the labor market has been dampened by:",
    "Microeconomic evidence complements the macro findings:",
    "The authors conclude that multiple factors jointly contribute to the observed moderation in wage growth, making it difficult to single out any one culprit.",
    "Macro mechanism:",
    "Micro mechanisms:",
    "Recent labor market tightening alone does not fully translate into stronger wage growth because of offsetting declines in trend productivity growth and labor’s income share.",
    "Addressing wage growth moderation likely requires attention to:",
    "Micro-level frictions—automation/offshoring exposure and industry concentration—are important channels shaping wage dynamics and may require targeted policy responses.",
    "**Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics, WP/18/138, June 2018**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics, WP/18/138, June 2018",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18138.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18138.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18138.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/15/understanding-u-s-45992/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-18T13:39:32.714Z"
}