{
  "title": "Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?",
  "publication": "IMF Working Papers, June 27, 2018",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/index.md",
  "summary": "The IMF provides training to its membership in its core areas of expertise mainly through its Institute for Capacity Development (ICD) or formerly the IMF Institute (INS). This paper looks at the methods that ICD used to evaluate this activity and analyzes the data collected over the period 2006–13.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Overview",
      "content": "- Title: Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?\n- Authors: Hali J Edison, Dimitre Milkov, Josephat Koima\n- Date: June 27, 2018\n- Core summary:\n  - The IMF provides training to its membership in its core areas of expertise mainly through its Institute for Capacity Development (ICD) or formerly the IMF Institute (INS).\n  - This paper analyzes the methods ICD used to evaluate training and the data collected over the period 2006–13.\n  - Since 2015, ICD has undertaken a review of its curriculum and revamped its courses and evaluations; the paper therefore provides a detailed analysis of the situation prior to that review.\n  - The study’s novel feature is its attempt to distill information from all evaluation sources in one place and to explain evaluation results using participant demographic information."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Methods and Scope",
      "content": "- Evaluation period and context:\n  - Data analyzed cover the period 2006–13.\n  - Analysis focuses on ICD training evaluations prior to the ICD curriculum and evaluation revamp undertaken since 2015.\n- Analytical approach:\n  - Consolidation of all evaluation sources into a single analysis.\n  - Use of participant demographic information to explain variation in evaluation results."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Key Findings",
      "content": "- General assessment:\n  - ICD’s training program is well liked across the surveys examined.\n- Variations in evaluation outcomes:\n  - Notable differences in results emerge when sorting evaluation results by:\n    - Course type.\n    - Geographic location.\n    - Whether evaluations were completed by participants or by their sponsoring managers."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Implications and Recommendations (as implied by analysis)",
      "content": "- Maintain consolidated evaluation practices to preserve the ability to analyze cross-cutting patterns across evaluation sources.\n- Use participant demographic information systematically to interpret evaluation outcomes and tailor course design.\n- Account for heterogeneity by course type and geographic location when assessing training effectiveness and designing improvements.\n- Incorporate perspectives from both participants and sponsoring managers to obtain a fuller picture of training impact.\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?, WP/18/151, June 2018\n  - Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?, WP/18/151, June 2018 (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?, WP/18/151, June 2018 (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: Hali J Edison, Dimitre Milkov, Josephat Koima",
    "Published: June 27, 2018",
    "Series: IMF Working Papers",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484347027.001",
    "Title: Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?",
    "Authors: Hali J Edison, Dimitre Milkov, Josephat Koima",
    "Date: June 27, 2018",
    "Core summary:",
    "Evaluation period and context:",
    "Analytical approach:",
    "General assessment:",
    "Variations in evaluation outcomes:",
    "Maintain consolidated evaluation practices to preserve the ability to analyze cross-cutting patterns across evaluation sources.",
    "Use participant demographic information systematically to interpret evaluation outcomes and tailor course design.",
    "Account for heterogeneity by course type and geographic location when assessing training effectiveness and designing improvements.",
    "Incorporate perspectives from both participants and sponsoring managers to obtain a fuller picture of training impact.",
    "**Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?, WP/18/151, June 2018**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Evaluating IMF Training: What Can We Learn?, WP/18/151, June 2018",
      "role": "document",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18151.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18151.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18151.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/06/27/evaluating-imf-training-what-can-we-learn-45719/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-18T13:43:19.327Z"
}