## Universal Basic Income in Developing Countries: Issues, Options, and Illustration for India

_IMF Working Papers, July 31, 2018_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Universal Basic Income in Developing Countries: Issues, Options, and Illustration for India](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/07/31/universal-basic-income-in-developing-countries-issues-options-and-illustration-for-india-46079)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/07/31/universal-basic-income-in-developing-countries-issues-options-and-illustration-for-india-46079/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/07/31/universal-basic-income-in-developing-countries-issues-options-and-illustration-for-india-46079/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/07/31/universal-basic-income-in-developing-countries-issues-options-and-illustration-for-india-46079/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: David Coady, Delphine Prady
- Published: July 31, 2018
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484370049.001

---

### Overview
- Paper discusses two common arguments for the adoption of a UBI:
  - It can be a more effective way of supporting low-income households when existing safety net programs are inefficient.
  - It can generate broad support for structural reforms.
- Uses India as an illustration to discuss trade-offs in adopting a UBI in these contexts.
- Emphasizes that careful communication and implementation are required to address political barriers to reform.

### Key Findings
- Replacing the 2011 Public Distribution System (PDS) with a UBI:
  - Results in losses for many low-income households.
  - Much of these losses can be reduced by:
    - Recycling the “out-of-system” PDS losses.
    - Recycling fiscal savings from excluding the highest-income groups as higher UBI transfers.
- Replacing inefficient energy subsidies with efficient pricing (raising energy prices to internalize negative environmental externalities):
  - Could deliver unambiguous distributional gains.
  - Could help address fiscal pressures.
  - Could improve energy efficiency with associated environmental and health gains.

### India Illustration and Trade-offs
- Analysis focuses on substitution of existing programs with a UBI and complementary recycling options:
  - Direct replacement of PDS by UBI leads to distributional losses for many low-income households.
  - Recycling strategies can mitigate but not necessarily eliminate these losses.
- Energy subsidy reform is presented as an alternative or complementary reform with clearer net benefits:
  - Efficient energy pricing internalizes negative environmental externalities.
  - Distributional, fiscal, environmental, and health gains are highlighted.

### Policy Recommendations and Implementation Considerations
- Recycle fiscal savings and out-of-system program losses to protect vulnerable households when designing a UBI that replaces existing programs.
- Consider excluding highest-income groups to increase transfer amounts available for lower-income households.
- Prioritize reforms that yield unambiguous gains (for example, replacing inefficient energy subsidies) where feasible.
- Implement careful communication and phased implementation strategies to address political barriers to reform.

---

## Content in this bundle

- **wp18174**
  - [wp18174 (Markdown version)](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18174.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [wp18174 (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2018/wp18174.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2018/07/31/universal-basic-income-in-developing-countries-issues-options-and-illustration-for-india-46079_