## Do Temporary Business Tax Cuts Matter? A General Equilibrium Analysis

_IMF Working Papers, February 15, 2019_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Do Temporary Business Tax Cuts Matter? A General Equilibrium Analysis](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2019/02/15/do-temporary-business-tax-cuts-matter-a-general-equilibrium-analysis-46524)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2019/02/15/do-temporary-business-tax-cuts-matter-a-general-equilibrium-analysis-46524/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2019/02/15/do-temporary-business-tax-cuts-matter-a-general-equilibrium-analysis-46524/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2019/02/15/do-temporary-business-tax-cuts-matter-a-general-equilibrium-analysis-46524/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: William Gbohoui
- Published: February 15, 2019
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393895.001

---

### Summary of approach
- Develops a dynamic general equilibrium model to assess the effects of temporary business tax cuts.
- Extends the Ricardian equivalence result to an environment with production.
- Analyzes cases with perfect capital markets and with financing frictions that raise the cost of investment.
- Investigates the role of distortionary taxes and expectations of future tax rates on investment incentives.

### Main findings
- Ricardian-equivalence extension:
  - A temporary tax cut financed by a future tax-increase has no real effect if the tax is lump-sum and capital markets are perfect.
- Financing-frictions case:
  - In the presence of financing frictions which raise the cost of investment, the policy temporarily relaxes the financing constraint thereby reducing the marginal cost of investment.
  - This direct effect implies positive marginal propensities to invest out of tax cuts.
- Distortionary-tax case:
  - When the tax is distortionary, the expectation of high future tax rates reduces the expected marginal return on investment, mitigating the direct stimulative effects.

### Policy implications
- Temporary business tax cuts are ineffective in altering real outcomes under lump-sum taxation and perfect capital markets (Ricardian equivalence holds).
- Temporary tax cuts can stimulate investment when financing frictions are present by lowering the effective marginal cost of investment through a temporary relaxation of financing constraints.
- The presence of distortionary taxation and expectations of future high tax rates can offset or blunt the stimulative investment effects of temporary tax cuts.

### Publication and metadata
- Author: William Gbohoui
- Publication date: February 15, 2019
- Series: Working Paper No. 2019/029
- Issue: 029
- Volume: 2019
- Pages: 39
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393895.001
- Stock No: WPIEA2019029
- ISBN: 9781484393895
- ISSN: 1018-5941
- Citation format shown on page: William Gbohoui. "Do Temporary Business Tax Cuts Matter? A General Equilibrium Analysis", IMF Working Papers 2019, 029 (2019), accessed 9/9/2026, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393895.001

*IMF Working Papers: Do Temporary Business Tax Cuts Matter? A General Equilibrium Analysis — William Gbohoui (February 15, 2019).*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Working Paper**
  - [Working Paper (Markdown version)](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2019/wpiea2019029.pdf.md){rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"}
  - [Working Paper (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2019/wpiea2019029.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2019/02/15/do-temporary-business-tax-cuts-matter-a-general-equilibrium-analysis-46524_