## Do FX Interventions Lead to Higher FX Debt? Evidence from Firm-Level Data

_IMF Working Papers, September 25, 2020_

## Source details

**Canonical URL:** [Do FX Interventions Lead to Higher FX Debt? Evidence from Firm-Level Data](https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2020/09/25/do-fx-interventions-lead-to-higher-debt-evidence-from-firm-level-data-49752)

## Other formats

- [Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2020/09/25/do-fx-interventions-lead-to-higher-debt-evidence-from-firm-level-data-49752/index.md)
- [Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2020/09/25/do-fx-interventions-lead-to-higher-debt-evidence-from-firm-level-data-49752/index.json)
- [Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2020/09/25/do-fx-interventions-lead-to-higher-debt-evidence-from-firm-level-data-49752/bundle-manifest.json)

## Bibliographic details
- Authors: Minsuk Kim, Rui Mano, Mico Mrkaic
- Published: September 25, 2020
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513557663.001

---

### Summary
- Central banks frequently conduct FX interventions (FXIs) — buying or selling reserves — to dampen sharp exchange rate movements caused by volatile capital flows.
- This study investigates whether FXIs incentivize firms to take on more unhedged FX debt, thereby increasing medium-term corporate vulnerabilities.
- Using a novel dataset with close to 5,000 nonfinancial firms across 19 emerging markets covering 2002--2017, the authors examine firm-level changes in FX debt shares following intensive FXIs.

### Data and Methodology
- Dataset: close to 5,000 nonfinancial firms.
- Coverage: 19 emerging markets.
- Period: 2002--2017.
- Outcome variable: firm-level share of FX debt.
- Key explanatory variable: intensity of FX interventions (FXI).

### Main Findings
- The firm-level share of FX debt rises following intensive use of FXIs.
- The effect is particularly pronounced for:
  - non-exporting firms, and
  - firms in shallow financial markets, especially those with no FX debt to begin with.
- Magnitude:
  - One standard deviation increase in FXI leads to an average 2 percentage points increase in the FX debt share.
- Reference statistic:
  - The median share of FX debt in the sample is zero.

### Economic Significance
- The estimated effect (2 percentage points increase in FX debt share per one standard deviation FXI change) is described as economically significant given the baseline distribution (median FX debt share = zero).

### Policy Implications and Interpretation
- FX interventions, while aimed at stabilizing exchange rates, may have unintended side effects by encouraging firms to increase unhedged FX borrowing.
- These changes in corporate balance sheets can raise medium-term vulnerabilities, particularly in environments characterized by limited financial market depth and for firms lacking prior FX exposures.
- Policymakers should weigh the short-term exchange rate stabilization benefits of FXIs against potential longer-term increases in corporate FX exposure and associated financial stability risks.

*IMF Working Paper: Do FX Interventions Lead to Higher FX Debt? Evidence from Firm-Level Data (Minsuk Kim, Rui Mano, Mico Mrkaic), Working Paper No. 2020/197, 35 pages, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513557663.001*

---

## Content in this bundle

- **Working Paper**
  - [Working Paper (PDF)](/-/media/files/publications/wp/2020/english/wpiea2020197-print-pdf.pdf){rel="external" type="application/pdf"}

---

_Source: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2020/09/25/do-fx-interventions-lead-to-higher-debt-evidence-from-firm-level-data-49752_