{
  "title": "State Fragility: Towards a Conceptual Framework",
  "publication": "IMF Working Papers, October 3, 2025",
  "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948",
  "canonical": "https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948",
  "overlayPath": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/index.md",
  "summary": "The paper proposes a general conceptual framework for state fragility that aims to disentangle the identification of fragility from its underlying drivers. It reduces the identification state fragility to the responsiveness of its economic or political systems to shocks.",
  "sections": [
    {
      "heading": "Overview",
      "content": "- Purpose: Proposes a general conceptual framework for state fragility that disentangles the identification of fragility from its underlying drivers.\n- Core reduction: Identification of state fragility is reduced to the responsiveness of economic or political systems to shocks.\n- Publication: IMF Working Papers, Working Paper No. 2025/205; Pages: 55; Volume: 2025; Issue: 205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229028578.001; ISBN: 9798229028578; ISSN: 1018-5941.\n- Authors: Aliona Cebotari, Enrique Chueca-Montuenga, Yoro Diallo, Yunsheng Ma, Rima A Turk, Weining Xin, Harold Zavarce.\n- Date: October 3, 2025."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Conceptual framework and definitions",
      "content": "- Fragility definition (extension of Taleb’s work):\n  - Fragility is a disproportionate (supra-linear) response to negative shocks.\n  - Fragility includes an underwhelming (sub-linear) response to positive shocks or to time.\n- Two distinct forms of fragility:\n  - Fragility to stress: breakdowns in political or economic systems in response to negative shocks.\n  - Chronic fragility: inability of economies to generate growth over time."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Manifested fragility vs latent fragility",
      "content": "- Manifested fragility:\n  - Identification where the produced list of fragile states closely aligns with classifications by international organizations.\n- Latent fragility:\n  - Identification where underlying drivers offer a probabilistic proximity to a fragile response.\n  - Latent fragility can be used to infer risk even when fragility is not yet manifested."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Methodology illustrated: coups d’état as a probe of political fragility",
      "content": "- Approach:\n  - Focus on coups d’état as reflective of political fragility.\n  - Use machine learning to examine coup drivers and their nonlinear interactions.\n  - Derive implied coup probabilities across all countries.\n- Emphasis:\n  - Nonlinear interactions among drivers are central to identifying latent fragility.\n  - Machine learning provides probabilistic assessments of proximity to fragile responses."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Key findings and analytical insights",
      "content": "- The responsiveness framework separates identification (system response) from drivers (structural fundamentals and stressors).\n- Fragility characterization:\n  - Supra-linear responses to negative shocks identify systems prone to breakdown.\n  - Sub-linear responses to positive shocks or to time identify systems with chronic growth incapacity.\n- Application results:\n  - Manifested fragility lists produced by the framework closely align with international organization classifications.\n  - Latent fragility estimates (via coup probability modeling) provide cross-country implied probabilities of political fragility."
    },
    {
      "heading": "Policy implications and recommendations",
      "content": "- Strategic priorities for engagement with fragile states:\n  - Prioritize elimination of sources of fragility through strengthened structural fundamentals.\n  - Mitigate stressors through stronger policies.\n- Expected returns:\n  - Both strengthening fundamentals and mitigating stressors have higher returns in chronically fragile environments.\n- Operational lesson:\n  - Distinguish interventions aimed at reducing susceptibility to negative shocks from those aimed at fostering sustained positive responses (growth over time).\n\nIMF Working Paper No. 2025/205. By Aliona Cebotari, Enrique Chueca-Montuenga, Yoro Diallo, Yunsheng Ma, Rima A Turk, Weining Xin, and Harold Zavarce. October 3, 2025.\n\n---\n\n Content in this bundle\n\n- Working Paper\n  - Working Paper (Markdown version){rel=\"alternate\" type=\"text/markdown\"}\n  - Working Paper (PDF){rel=\"external\" type=\"application/pdf\"}\n\n---\n\nSource: https://www.imf.org/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948"
    }
  ],
  "bullets": [
    "[Markdown version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/index.md)",
    "[Structured JSON version](/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/index.json)",
    "[Bundle manifest](/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/bundle-manifest.json)",
    "Authors: Aliona Cebotari, Enrique Chueca-Montuenga, Yoro Diallo, Yunsheng Ma, Rima A Turk, Weining Xin, Harold Zavarce",
    "Published: October 3, 2025",
    "Series: IMF Working Papers",
    "DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229028578.001",
    "Purpose: Proposes a general conceptual framework for state fragility that disentangles the identification of fragility from its underlying drivers.",
    "Core reduction: Identification of state fragility is reduced to the responsiveness of economic or political systems to shocks.",
    "Publication: IMF Working Papers, Working Paper No. 2025/205; Pages: 55; Volume: 2025; Issue: 205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229028578.001; ISBN: 9798229028578; ISSN: 1018-5941.",
    "Authors: Aliona Cebotari, Enrique Chueca-Montuenga, Yoro Diallo, Yunsheng Ma, Rima A Turk, Weining Xin, Harold Zavarce.",
    "Date: October 3, 2025.",
    "Fragility definition (extension of Taleb’s work):",
    "Two distinct forms of fragility:",
    "Manifested fragility:",
    "Latent fragility:",
    "Approach:",
    "Emphasis:",
    "The responsiveness framework separates identification (system response) from drivers (structural fundamentals and stressors).",
    "Fragility characterization:",
    "Application results:",
    "Strategic priorities for engagement with fragile states:",
    "Expected returns:",
    "Operational lesson:",
    "**Working Paper**"
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "title": "Working Paper",
      "role": "paper",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2025/english/wpiea2025205-source-pdf.pdf",
      "summary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2025/english/wpiea2025205-source-pdf.pdf.md",
        "mime": "text/markdown"
      },
      "binary": {
        "path": "/-/media/files/publications/wp/2025/english/wpiea2025205-source-pdf.pdf",
        "mime": "application/pdf"
      }
    }
  ],
  "alternates": {
    "markdown": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/index.md",
    "json": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/index.json",
    "bundleManifest": "/en/publications/wp/issues/2025/10/03/state-fragility-towards-a-conceptual-framework-570948/bundle-manifest.json"
  },
  "generatedAtUtc": "2026-09-17T02:25:15.011Z"
}