Selected Decisions and Selected Documents of the IMF, Thirty- Ninth Issue -- The Chairman’s Summing Up of the Discussion on the Enhancement of the Structural Adjustment Facility—Operational Arrangements, Executive Board Meeting 87/171, December 15, 1987

Prepared by the Legal Department of the IMF
As updated as of March 31, 2017

<Previous DocumentNext Document>
Technical and Financial Services
Financial Services
Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust

The Chairman’s Summing Up of the Discussion on the Enhancement of the Structural Adjustment Facility—Operational Arrangements

Executive Board Meeting 87/171, December 15, 1987

Let me summarize the agreed position on a number of important points.

  • 1. Establishment of the enhanced adjustment facility and review of the existing facility


  • 2. Terms and conditions of loans under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility

The intended terms for the Trust’s lending, with which you have agreed, determine the essential features of the borrowing arrangements that will have to be concluded by the Fund as Trustee for the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility Trust and the lenders to it. These have been set out in a prototype circulated to potential lenders and annexed to EBS/87/245. While there will need to be comparability in substance among agreements, there will no doubt need to be alterations to the form and structure of this prototype to meet the particular legal and institutional requirements of individual lenders, and we will be flexible in meeting these requirements. There was further discussion of the security to be provided to the claims on the Trust. Directors accepted that the proposals that had been put forward to safeguard the resources lent to the Trust were adequate to provide the necessary assurance to potential creditors. Although noting the views of some Directors, I have repeated that the phrase “all such initiatives as might be necessary” had to be understood to include the possible use of gold.

I should also comment on a few specific financial issues raised in the papers. First, most Directors did not favor the inclusion of a provision on rescheduling because, inter alia, it was considered that this would create undue complications in light of the limited period for which resources were being committed by contributors and also because it was felt that such a provision could threaten the integrity of the Reserve that most contributors find to be an essential component of the facility. Second, most Directors did not find it appropriate to provide for temporary encashment of claims through the use of the Reserve, given the relatively small amounts that will be available in the early years and the importance of the Reserve as security for claims. Third, it appeared generally acceptable to most Directors that the provision for temporary suspension of calls should apply to all lenders. I should note in this connection that we appreciate the position of several contributors who are providing support to the enhanced facility, despite a very difficult balance of payments situation of their own.

  • 3. Framework for lending under the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility

  • 4. Relationship with other Fund facilities

Directors noted that members qualifying for loans under the enhanced structural adjustment facility would retain eligibility for access to the Fund’s general resources. Access to those resources will have to be examined carefully on a case-by-case basis, taking into account a range of factors envisaged in the present guidelines, including past performance and use of Fund resources, terms, the possible availability of financing from the enhanced facility and other sources, and the speed and time profile of the anticipated balance of payments adjustment.


December 18, 1987

<Previous DocumentNext Document>