Poverty Reduction Strategy in IMF-supported Programs
July 16, 2015
Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRS) are central to IMF-supported economic and financial programs in low-income countries. PRS documents assess the poverty challenge, describe how macroeconomic, structural, and social policies and programs can promote growth and reduce poverty, and outline external financing needs and the associated sources of financing. They are prepared by governments in low-income countries generally through a participatory process involving domestic stakeholders and external development partners.
The PRS approach was initiated by the IMF and the World Bank in 1999 in the context of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, with countries preparing Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and Annual Progress Reports (APRs) as a basis for debt reduction. The same documents were subsequently used to anchor IMF-supported
programs for low-income countries in clear strategies to achieve sustained poverty reduction and growth. With the HIPC Initiative almost completed and the World Bank delinking its concessional financing support to IDA countries from the PRS approach in 2014, the Fund adopted in June 2015 a more flexible and streamlined PRS policy for its engagement with low-income countries.
Core principles of the current PRS policy in IMF-supported
- Maintain the link between the member’s PRS and policies under IMF-supported
programs, with streamlined PRS documentation. This is important to demonstrate that policies under IMF-supported
programs are consistent with the authorities’ PRS.
- Preserve the national ownership of the PRS process. Where national documents of good quality, encompassing the authorities’ PRS, exist, these will be used for documenting the country’s PRS, instead of requiring a new document for Fund purpose. Where such a document does not exist, a short document meeting at least the minimum standards (defined below) will be required.
- Provide flexibility in the scope and coverage of the PRS to reflect different country circumstances. Countries’ priorities and capacities vary greatly and should be taken into account when assessing the quality of the PRS documentation.
Forms of PRS documentation
The authorities’ PRS will be documented through an Economic Development Document (EDD) meeting the minimum standards defined below, and can take two forms: i) existing national development plans documenting countries’ PRS; or ii) a new EDD focused on elements of the PRS that are macro-relevant under an IMF-supported program (around 10-15 pages). Apart from the few countries still under the HIPC Initiative, preparation of PRSPs and APRs is no longer needed for the Fund’s engagement with low-income countries; on the same basis, Joint Staff Advisory Notes (JSANs) will no longer be prepared by Bank and Fund staff.
Contents of EDDs
EDDs must meet the following minimum standards to ensure a clear strategic platform for policies supported under an ECF arrangement or PSI:
- A strategy or plan, describing an overall strategy or plan for poverty reduction and growth.
- Specific policies, including macroeconomic and financial policies that would be pursued in the context of the strategy.
- The launch date and timeframe for implementation, to ensure that the strategy underlying IMF-supported
programs is current.
- The extent of participatory process, which is encouraged, but not required.
In addition to the minimum standards, countries are strongly encouraged to produce high quality EDD based on good practice guidelines. Depending on countries’ circumstances and capacity, the description of the following elements would be encouraged:
- Existing poverty situation and trends.
- Factors influencing poverty, including bottlenecks to poverty reduction.
- A strategy for poverty reduction particularly focused on its macro-related aspects, as well as specific policies for the implementation of the strategy.
- A fiscal and debt framework, with the view of prioritizing development spending needs based on a realistic assessment of fiscal space.
- Spending effectiveness, focusing on how well money is spent on poverty.
- Safety nets and risk mitigation.
- Participatory process.
Staff will continue to draw heavily on World Bank expertise and advice on poverty reduction issues. To complement the EDD, World Bank staff will be asked to provide an assessment letter to the IMF Executive Board identifying strengths and risks of the member’s PRS and priority areas for attention during implementation. As a good practice, Fund staff will seek to review PRS implementation by the time of the fourth review under an ECF arrangement or PSI. This review will reflect consultations and dialog with country authorities and relevant stakeholders, including the World Bank.
PRS under the HIPC Process
The current policy does not apply in the context of the HIPC initiative. For the purpose of reaching the HIPC decision or completion points, countries under the HIPC Initiative would continue to be subject to the PRS documentation procedures as defined under the PRG-HIPC initiative.