IMF Surveillance
|
The IMF is mandated to oversee the international monetary system and monitor the economic and financial policies of its 185 member countries. This activity is known as surveillance. During this process, which takes place both at the global level and in individual countries, the IMF highlights possible risks to stability and growth and advises on needed policy adjustments. In this way, it helps the international monetary system serve its essential purpose of facilitating the exchange of goods, services, and capital among countries, thereby sustaining sound economic growth. |
Why is IMF surveillance important?
In today's globalized economy, where the policies of one country may affect many other countries, international cooperation is essential. The IMF, with its nearly-universal membership of 185 countries, facilitates this cooperation. There are two main aspects to the IMF's work: multilateral surveillance, or oversight of the world economy; and bilateral surveillance, which comprises appraisal of and advice on the policies of each member country.
Country surveillance
On a regular basis—usually once a year—IMF economists visit member countries to gather information and exchange views with government and central bank officials. During their mission, IMF staff also often meet with other stakeholders, such as parliamentarians and representatives of business, labor unions, and civil society to help evaluate the country's economic policies and direction. Upon its return to headquarters, the mission submits a report to the IMF's Executive Board for discussion. The Board's views are subsequently transmitted to the country's authorities.
In recent years, surveillance has become increasingly transparent. Almost all member countries now agree to publication of a Public Information Notice, which summarizes the views of IMF staff and the Executive Board. In nine out of ten cases, the staff report and other accompanying analysis is also published on the IMF's website.
Multilateral surveillance
The IMF continuously reviews global and regional economic trends. Its key instruments of global and regional surveillance are two semi-annual publications, the World Economic Outlook (WEO) and the Global Financial Stability Report (GFSR). The WEO provides detailed analysis of the state of the world economy, addressing issues of pressing interest, such as the current global financial turmoil and the challenge of global inflation. The GFSR provides an up-to-date assessment of global financial markets and prospects and addresses emerging market financing issues in a global context. Its purpose is to highlight imbalances and vulnerabilities that could pose risks to financial market stability. The IMF also publishes Regional Economic Outlook reports, providing more detailed analysis for five major regions.
Sometimes the IMF will draw attention to specific inter-linkages in the global economy. In 2006, the IMF introduced multilateral consultations to foster debate and develop policy actions as a means to address problems of systemic or regional importance. The first such consultation took place in 2006-07, with a focus on addressing global economic imbalances. China, the Euro area, Japan, Saudi Arabia, and the United States participated, and made individual statements describing how they intended to deal with the imbalances.
The evolution of IMF surveillance and its role today
Surveillance in its present form was established by Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, which was revised in the late 1970s following the collapse of the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. Under Article IV, member countries undertake to collaborate with the IMF and with one another to promote the stability of the global system of exchange rates. In particular, they commit to running their domestic and external economic policies in keeping with a mutually agreed code of conduct. For its part, the IMF is charged with (i) overseeing the international monetary system to ensure its effective operation, and (ii) monitor each member's compliance with its policy obligations. To ensure that surveillance remains effective, the IMF is constantly reviewing its policy framework.
Strengthening the policy framework for surveillance
In June 2007, the policy framework of surveillance received a major update, its first since the 1970s, through the new Decision on Bilateral Surveillance over Members' Policies. The Decision clarifies:
• that country surveillance should be focused on assessing whether countries' policies promote external stability. That means that surveillance should mainly focus on exchange rate, monetary, fiscal, and financial policies and assess risks and vulnerabilities;
• what is and what is not acceptable to the international community in terms of how countries conduct their exchange rate policies; and
• that surveillance should be collaborative, candid, and evenhanded, and take into account countries' specific circumstances.
In order to strengthen implementation, a set of guidelines were published in August 2008. In these guidelines, the Managing Director proposes the use of "ad hoc consultations" on exchange rates to supplement the usual consultation procedures.
Strengthening the practice of surveillance
Surveillance needs to evolve with the global economy. For example, the recent financial market turbulence has shown the need for deeper analysis of the linkages between the real economy and the financial sector. Building on the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), financial sector issues are receiving greater coverage under surveillance and analytical tools for integrating financial sector and capital markets analysis into macroeconomic assessments are being developed. In their advice to individual countries, IMF staff seeks to leverage cross-country experiences and policy lessons, drawing on the organization's unique vantage point as a global financial institution. In line with the new surveillance decision (discussed above), the IMF is also sharpening its exchange rate assessments.
Additionally, the IMF is working with countries and sovereign wealth funds to develop a comprehensive set of voluntary best practices and principles that can guide their organizational structures and investment policies and help improve understanding of how these funds operate.
