On February 17, 2017, the Executive Board of the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) concluded the Fifth Post-Program Monitoring
[1]
with Portugal.
After a sluggish first half, the economy experienced a welcome upturn
in growth in the second half of 2016, boosted by stronger exports and a
further decline in unemployment to pre-crisis levels. These
developments point to an improved near-term outlook, but medium-term
growth could be put on a more sustainable footing by reducing
structural bottlenecks and high levels of corporate debt. The revised
2016 fiscal target appears likely to have been met, but prospective
public outlays for banking sector recapitalization continue to weigh on
public debt trends.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They
welcomed Portugal’s improved macroeconomic performance in the second
half of 2016, marked by a pick‑up in growth, a decline in unemployment,
and a fiscal outturn in line with the target. In addition, Portugal has
continued to successfully access bond markets and its capacity to repay
the Fund is expected to be adequate. Nonetheless, Directors noted that
the public debt remains high, and the large annual financing needs,
combined with banking system challenges, leave Portugal vulnerable to a
range of shocks and a tightening of financing conditions. Directors,
therefore, emphasized the need for a stronger momentum to improve
financial sector resilience, ensure durable fiscal consolidation, and
raise potential growth.
Directors welcomed the recognition by the authorities that continued
efforts to improve banking sector soundness are warranted. They
stressed that a comprehensive clean‑up of bank balance sheets is
essential to break the vicious circle between weak banks, high
non‑performing loans (NPLs), and low growth. This should include a
predictable, time‑bound, and credible plan for banks to write‑off or
restructure non‑performing legacy assets, strengthen internal
governance, and improve bank profitability, including by further
cutting costs. This would help attract new private capital to support
the clean‑up of bank balance sheets. In this context, Directors were
encouraged by the authorities’ proposals to address NPLs, including
supervisory, legal, and judicial measures to incentivize banks to
dispose of non‑performing loans and reduce corporate debt.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to continued fiscal
consolidation and noted their five‑pillar strategy. They underscored
the importance of a well‑specified medium‑term fiscal adjustment path
that balances the need to put debt on a firmly downward trajectory
while supporting growth. They stressed that a fiscal consolidation path
that relies more on durable expenditure reform and greater spending
efficiency, and less on one‑off measures and capital expenditure
compression, would be more sustainable and supportive of growth. They
also noted the importance of strengthening the budget process.
Directors underscored that reinvigorating macro‑critical structural
reforms remains essential to boost the economy’s competitiveness,
growth potential, and resilience to shocks. They encouraged the
authorities to proceed with reforms in labor and product markets, with
a particular focus on tackling labor market segmentation, improving
education and skills, and enhancing public sector efficiency. They
noted that it would be important to ensure that increases in the
minimum wage do not impair labor competitiveness and undermine
prospects for new entrants to the labor force. Removing regulatory
barriers, strengthening institutional capacity, and addressing other
supply bottlenecks are also considered critical reforms.