IMF Executive Board Concludes 2015 Article IV Consultation with Nicaragua

Press Release No. 16/35
February 1, 2016

IMF Executive Board Concludes 2015 Article IV Consultation with Nicaragua

On January 28, 2016, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation1 with Nicaragua.

Economic developments in 2015 have been broadly positive. Growth, after reaching 4.7 percent in 2014, is expected to moderate owing to the effects of a drought and the decline in commodity prices; real GDP grew by 3.9 percent in the first half of the year. Inflation declined to 3 percent in October, mainly reflecting declines in food and transportation costs. Core inflation remained stable at around 6.5 percent.

The consolidated public sector deficit widened to 2 percent in 2014 (1.3 percent of GDP in 2013), largely due to a decline in grants originating from the oil collaboration with Venezuela. Nevertheless, the public debt ratio declined to about 41 percent of GDP in 2014 from 43 percent in 2013. The fiscal position through August 2015 improved relative to the same period in 2014. This is largely explained by a better performance at the central government level that has compensated for the deterioration in the fiscal balance of state-owned enterprises.

The current account deficit improved to 7.1 percent of GDP in 2014, largely due to a smaller oil bill. However, the current account deficit deteriorated in the first half of 2015 as the country faced a less favorable external environment. In particular, export performance weakened as a result of the softening of commodities prices and the expiration of the preferential trade agreement with the United States in late 2014.

The financial sector appears to remain robust despite still high credit growth. As of August 2015, capital adequacy ratios (13.3 percent) were above the 10 percent regulatory level, and the non-performing loan ratios, including restructured loans, remained below 3 percent. Private sector credit growth has slowed but remains high (20 percent), in particular for consumer and commercial credit, and continues to exceed the growth rate of deposits.

Poverty has fallen sharply and there has been progress in gender equality, but education attainment remains a drag on growth. The 2014 household survey reveals that 29.6 percent of the population lives in poverty (42.5 percent in 2009), and 8.3 percent in extreme poverty (14.6 percent in 2009). Per capita consumption increased by 33 percent, helped by a fall in the average household size and a rise in per capita remittances. Nicaragua has made inroads in improving gender equality. However, despite some improvement in primary school completion rates (from 74 percent in 2005 to 80.4 percent in 2010), surveys of private firms suggest that labor skills remain a bottleneck to growth.

The medium-term outlook remains broadly favorable. Growth is expected to moderately accelerate in 2016, owing to the projected recovery in foreign demand and an increase in election-related spending, which would result in a more expansionary fiscal policy. In the medium term, staff estimates that growth will converge to its potential of 4 percent. The current account deficit is expected to widen to 8½ percent of GDP as terms of trade are projected to deteriorate. To address large infrastructure and social needs, the government plans to step up spending by over 3 percentage points of GDP over the medium term. As a result, the public debt ratio is projected to stabilize around 41 percent of GDP by 2020.

Executive Board Assessment2

Directors commended the Nicaraguan authorities’ sound policies, which have enhanced macroeconomic stability and led to strong economic growth and poverty reduction. They noted, however, that risks to the outlook are tilted to the downside, particularly due to external factors. Against this backdrop, Directors emphasized that, while the policy mix is broadly appropriate to maintain stability over the near term, the country needs to fortify its policy framework to sustain strong growth over the medium term.

Directors noted that the fiscal stance will be moderately expansionary in 2016, but that it remains consistent with the authorities’ plans to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio by 2020. They considered, however, that building additional fiscal buffers, following the forthcoming elections, will be essential to insure against potential risks and to put public finances on a more solid footing. This consolidation could be attained by reducing tax exonerations and exemptions and improving the targeting of fiscal subsidies, which in turn would strengthen the efficiency and equity of public finances. From a longer-term perspective, Directors stressed the importance of improving the financial viability of the social security institute and loss-making state-owned enterprises.

Directors welcomed the authorities’ continued interest in strengthening the fiscal accounts. They emphasized the importance of increasing the institutional coverage of the public sector, improving the quality of fiscal and public debt statistics, and publishing the public institutions’ financial statements to enhance transparency.

Directors agreed that rapid credit expansion amid high dollarization warrants close monitoring, especially in light of possible currency mismatches, persistent U.S. dollar strength, and the likely increase in U.S. interest rates. In this regard, they noted that macro-prudential policies could help mitigate some of these risks. Directors also called for additional efforts to strengthen banking supervision and enhance regional financial regulatory cooperation. They encouraged full implementation of the 2009 Safeguards Assessment’s recommendations and further strengthening the framework for anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism.

Directors agreed that improvements in competitiveness would reduce the economy’s vulnerability to external shocks, support its diversification, and spur its structural transformation. In this context, they recommended further improving infrastructure, enhancing trade networks, investing in human capital, and reducing barriers to entry. Such reforms would also serve to reduce the size of the informal economy, unemployment, and poverty.

Directors called for continued improvements in the timeliness, quality, and reliability of statistics, which will help enhance economic decision-making and transparency. They also recommended following a consistent communication strategy when methodological changes are introduced.


Nicaragua: Selected Economic Indicators, 2012–16
 

 

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

 

 

    Proj.
 

Output

 

 

 

 

 

GDP growth (percent)

5.1 4.5 4.7 4.0 4.2

GDP (nominal, U.S.$ million)

10,460 10,851 11,806 12,102 12,754

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prices

(Percent)

GDP deflator

7.1 4.2 9.1 3.5 6.1

Consumer price inflation (period average)

7.2 7.1 6.0 3.5 6.1

Consumer price inflation (end of period)

6.6 5.7 6.5 3.5 6.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange rate

(Córdobas per U.S.$)

Period average

23.5 24.7 26.0

End of period

24.1 25.3 26.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal sector

(Percent of GDP)

Consolidated public sector

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

25.6 25.9 25.8 27.6 28.1

Expenditure

28.5 28.9 28.9 31.5 31.8

Current

23.1 22.9 22.9 24.5 24.8

of which: wages & salaries1/

7.3 7.4 7.1 7.4 7.4

Capital

5.3 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.1

Overall balance, before grants

-2.9 -3.0 -3.1 -3.9 -3.7

Overall balance, after grants

-0.8 -1.3 -2.0 -2.7 -2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money and credit

(Annual percentage change)

Broad money

16.3 18.5 15.9 21.5 10.9

Credit to the private sector

26.3 20.2 20.5 18.7 11.9

Net domestic assets of the banking system

25.4 17.5 6.0 10.9 6.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

External sector

(Percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

Current account

-10.6 -11.1 -7.1 -8.0 -8.2

of which: oil imports

12.0 10.5 9.2 5.5 5.3

Capital and financial account

20.2 15.1 13.6 9.3 9.8

of which: FDI

6.8 6.5 6.8 6.4 6.2

Gross reserves (U.S.$ million)2/

1,778 1,874 2,147 2,273 2,450

In months of imports excl. maquila2/

3.4 3.5 4.1 4.1 4.2

Net international reserves2/

1,609 1,723 2,018 2,171 2,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public sector debt3/

41.9 43.0 40.8 42.6 41.9

Private sector external debt

44.8 48.1 46.1 47.9 48.8
 
 

Sources: Country authorities; World Bank; and Fund staff calculations and estimates.

1/The figures for 2012-13 include an off-budget wage bonus that was financed with Venezuela-related resources. Starting in 2014 the wage bonus is included in the budget.

2/Excludes the Deposit Guarantee Fund for Financial Institutions (FOGADE).

3/Assumes that HIPC-equivalent terms were applied to the outstanding debt to non-Paris Club bilaterals. Does not include SDR allocations.


1 Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country's economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

2 At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summing up can be found here: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.



IMF COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT

Media Relations
E-mail: media@imf.org
Phone: 202-623-7100