Democratizing the Money Market
IMF Blog, May 26, 2017
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Democratizing the Money Market
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: The Editors
- Published: May 26, 2017
Overview
- Publication: The Editors, May 26, 2017
- Theme: How financial technology (fintech) is changing the creation, administration, and accessibility of money markets.
- Key voice: Patrick Murck, lawyer and bitcoin expert of Harvard University (podcast interview).
Benefits and transformative effects
- “The real story of fintech is that we are democratizing the creation and the administration of markets."
- Examples of democratizing mechanisms cited:
- Lending marketplaces.
- “Robo advisors” allowing broader participation in markets.
- Broader claim: “These transformations tend to be democratizing and wealth-building for societies over time.”
Risks and disruptive potential
- Permission-less transactions: “If money moves around the world the way email moves around the world, that would be a huge disruptive force throughout the financial sector,” and “There is no gatekeeper, nobody saying you can't do this.”
- Privacy concerns from transparent, accessible financial databases.
- Trade-off emphasized: the need for caution and regulations should be weighed against the need for broader access and innovation.
Regulation and policy considerations
- Current state: “So far there’s no clear road map for policymakers to manage this digital transition.”
- Principle-based regulation recommended: “From a regulatory perspective, if you can clearly articulate the principles that you are trying to achieve, maybe you can give some of the innovators a chance to meet your policy goals, without your having to go and write very technology-specific rules around them.”
- Concern about stifling innovation: “There’s certainly risks involved in trying to contain innovation—history has been unkind to those who have supported restraining innovation rather than harnessing it.”
Proportionality and scale in regulatory design
- Proportionality argument: small fintech firms should not face the same regulatory burden as large financial corporations.
- Exact illustrative thresholds used by Murck:
- Customer base of only 10,000 people.
- Assets of roughly $10 million.
- Warning: “No one will ever have a fintech startup if regulatory requirements demand an asset management base of trillions of dollars.”
- Recommended regulatory stance: “If regulators are not willing to take a patient, technology-neutral approach, it will keep people from creating new companies—and that’s a shame.”
IMF follow-up
- IMF staff plan: new analysis on fintech from IMF staff to be written about in June.
- Call to readers: “Our IMFBlog readers should also stay tuned for new analysis on fintech from IMF staff, that we plan to write about in June.”
Source: IMF IMFBlog — "Democratizing the Money Market", The Editors, May 26, 2017.