Africa Cannot Confront Climate Change Alone
IMF Blog, December 17, 2021
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Africa Cannot Confront Climate Change Alone
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: a percentage point.
- Published: December 17, 2021
Africa’s contribution to and exposure from climate change
- Africa’s 1.4 billion people — around 17% of the global population — are responsible for less than 3% of the world’s total greenhouse-gas emissions.
- Data suggest that the forests of the Congo River Basin alone absorb 3% of global carbon-dioxide emissions every year.
- The continent is experiencing more frequent climate-related disasters, hotter weather, erratic rainfall, and rising sea levels, causing human tragedy, social upheaval, and economic disruption.
- With each new drought, annual per capita growth over the medium term can decline by a percentage point.
Economic and development implications
- Climate shocks undermine development and raise the urgency of building resilience, especially in countries dependent on rain-fed agriculture.
- Climate adaptation needs come on top of financing required to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.
- COP26 discussions concluded that African leaders indicated the region would need $1.3 trillion over the next two decades for climate adaptation and mitigation.
- The COVID-19 pandemic has driven up debt levels and constrained growth, making required sums out of reach for African countries.
- Efforts by the international community to date have fallen short.
Africa Adaptation Acceleration Plan and cost-effectiveness of adaptation
- The African Union-endorsed Africa Adaptation Acceleration Plan calls for investments in:
- resilient infrastructure,
- climate-adaptive agriculture,
- digitalization,
- trade reforms,
- broadening of safety nets.
- These measures are up to 12 times more cost-effective than disaster relief.
- Well-designed adaptation measures also generate jobs, raise incomes, and improve living standards.
Financing mechanisms and examples
- Grant and concessional financing should be used more effectively; multilateral climate funds and development banks should seek opportunities to streamline project approvals (while maintaining safeguards) to get money flowing faster.
- Well-targeted interventions that unblock bottlenecks or redress market failures can help crowd in private-sector funding; for example, increased digital connectivity supports entrepreneurs providing crop insurance, weather services, or real-time agricultural advice.
- Green bonds can finance climate initiatives at comparatively low rates, but Africa trails other regions:
- From 2007 to 2018, the region accounted for around $2 billion in issuances — just 0.4% of the global market for green bonds.
- New bilateral and innovative financing examples:
- The United Kingdom agreed to provide $500 million to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to curb forest loss.
- Norway has a similar agreement with Gabon for $150 million.
- The Seychelles’ $15 million “blue bond” issuance in 2018, guaranteed by the World Bank, finances ocean-based projects and, thanks to a reduced interest rate, helps to lower the national debt.
- COP26 generated a bespoke deal: an $8.5 billion mix of grants and cheap loans to help South Africa decarbonize its economy.
- Debt-for-climate swaps are highlighted as a related idea, requiring a large pool of swappable debt, standardized performance indicators, and related data.
Risk mitigation and governance to unlock financing
- Helping African governments access new sources of capital depends on reducing credit- and country-risk profiles.
- Domestic actions include improving governance through reforms in procurement and management of public investment, public finances, and debt, and ensuring carefully costed and fiscally sustainable investment plans.
- On the international side, standardized measures — such as a system of first-loss guarantees — could improve risk profiles and catalyze private financial flows; careful design is needed to ensure appropriate risk-sharing across public and private sectors.
Role of the International Monetary Fund and new facilities
- The IMF is playing a role in building national capacity to address climate challenges (the DRC is one of the first recipients of the IMF’s support for climate-focused capacity development).
- Through the Fund’s Article IV surveillance, investors are kept apprised of countries’ progress in implementing climate adaptation measures.
- Following the recent $650 billion allocation of new special drawing rights (the IMF’s unit of account), the Fund has a green light to establish a new Resilience and Sustainability Trust.
- This facility will provide affordable, longer-maturity financing for poor and vulnerable middle-income members and small states undertaking structural reforms to transform their economies and address climate risks.
Policy recommendations and imperatives
- Use grant and concessional financing more effectively and streamline project approvals while maintaining safeguards.
- Target interventions that redress market failures to crowd in private-sector funding (e.g., leveraging digital connectivity).
- Expand new financing mechanisms, including green bonds and debt-for-climate swaps, and develop standardized performance indicators and related data.
- Improve domestic governance and fiscal sustainability to reduce credit risk and attract capital.
- Design international risk-sharing instruments (for example, first-loss guarantees) to catalyze private finance with appropriate public–private risk allocation.
- Scale up comprehensive, well-financed adaptation to secure development gains and enable people to live, work, and prosper in the new climate economy.
Source: International Monetary Fund — "Africa Cannot Confront Climate Change Alone", December 17, 2021.