Russian Federation: Concluding Statement for the September 2014 Staff Visit; October 1, 2014

IMF News, October 1, 2014

Source details

Canonical URL: Russian Federation: Concluding Statement for the September 2014 Staff Visit; October 1, 2014

GDP is expected to grow by only 0.2 percent in 2014 and 0.5 percent in 2015.
Consumption is expected to weaken as real wages and consumer credit growth moderate.
Capital outflows are expected to reach USD 100 billion in 2014 and moderate somewhat but remain high in 2015.
Inflation is projected to remain over 8 percent by the end of 2014, mostly due to an increase in food prices caused by import restrictions, and depreciation of the ruble.
In the absence of further policy actions, inflation is expected to stay above target in 2015.
Despite the slowdown, the economy is expected to have limited excess capacity owing to structural impediments to growth.

Risks are tilted to the downside.
Current projections assume a gradual resolution of geopolitical tensions over the next year.
Deterioration of confidence, or an escalation or prolongation of geopolitical tensions, could lead to larger capital outflows, greater exchange rate pressure, higher inflation, and lower growth.
A reduction in world oil prices could amplify adverse impacts.

Maintaining a stable and predictable macroeconomic framework is essential to underpin confidence.
Key elements recommended:
- Following the fiscal rule.
- Pursuing the inflation targeting agenda underpinned by a fully-flexible exchange rate regime.
- Investing the resources of the National Wealth Fund only with appropriate safeguards.
Russia’s buffers noted:
- A large level of reserves.
- A positive net international investment position.
- Low public debt.
- A small general government deficit.
Given uncertainties and structural weaknesses, using these buffers wisely is key to resilience.

The CBR should tighten policy rates further to reduce inflation and continue its path towards inflation targeting underpinned by a fully-flexible exchange rate.
The CBR has appropriately raised its policy rates in recent months while resuming the path to greater exchange rate flexibility.
Core inflation has accelerated, implying monetary tightening is necessary to anchor inflation expectations.
Higher interest rates would also help limit capital outflows—especially in an environment of tightening global liquidity—and reduce the bank funding gap by bringing real policy rates firmly into the positive territory.
The CBR’s operational independence should be safeguarded; while broad ownership is desirable in setting medium-term inflation goals, implementation of policies to reach the target should be the exclusive domain of the CBR.
A clear mandate will be critical to ensure a credible transition to inflation targeting.

Increased oversight and heightened financial stability remain a priority.
Banks and the corporate sector face a challenging environment due to the weak economy, limited access to external financing, and higher financing costs.
Existing financial buffers together with appropriate policy responses by the CBR have limited financial instability thus far.
In case of acute liquidity pressures:
- Emergency facilities should be temporarily offered to eligible counterparties, against appropriate collateral, priced to be solely attractive during stress periods.
In the event of market dysfunctions and excessive currency volatility:
- Foreign exchange interventions should be used without targeting a certain level of the exchange rate.

The fiscal stance envisioned for 2015 is appropriately neutral.
The proposed federal budget, which is consistent with the fiscal rule, envisions a loosening in 2015, offset by a tightening at the sub-federal levels.
This balance addresses the need to consolidate in the medium term (with the non-oil deficit remaining near historical high) while providing supportive fiscal policy during the downturn.
Adherence to the fiscal framework is essential; the fiscal rule should become a cornerstone of macroeconomic credibility.
Recommendations:
- Resist mounting spending pressures and preserve fiscal space for public investment to meet large infrastructure needs.
- The use of the National Wealth Fund for domestic infrastructure projects may be appropriate if done in the context of the budget process and subject to appropriate safeguards.
- The diversion of contributions from the fully-funded pillar weakens the viability of the pension system, creates disincentives to save, and dilutes the credibility of the fiscal rule.

Enhancing Russia’s growth potential requires bold structural reforms and further global integration.
Sanctions, counter-sanctions, and heightened uncertainty are leading to additional state interventions, slowdown in the structural reform agenda, and decreased global integration.
Even if uncertainty dissipates next year, domestic demand and potential growth are projected to remain weak in the medium term due to insufficient investment and deterioration in productivity.
Potential growth is projected to be about 1.2 percent in 2015, reaching 1.8 percent in 2019, with downside risks.
Structural reform priorities:
- Provide appropriate incentives to expand investment and allocate resources to enhance efficiency.
- Protect investors, reduce trade barriers, fight corruption, reinvigorate the privatization agenda, improve competition and the business climate, and continue efforts at global integration.
Measures to mitigate geopolitical uncertainties should avoid amplifying existing distortions in the economy.

Russian Federation: Concluding Statement for the September 2014 Staff Visit; October 1, 2014