Washington, DC:
On May 19, 2021, The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with the Republic of Slovenia.
The pandemic is inflicting much suffering, which has been met with swift,
substantial, and well-coordinated policy responses. The anti-crisis
measures have helped preserve jobs, provide liquidity to companies and
income support to vulnerable groups. They averted a much larger decline in
output and kept unemployment under control. However, real GDP still dropped
by 5.5 percent in 2020, as containment measures led to falling economic
activity. The COVID-related spending, together with lower revenue, drove up
the fiscal deficit and public debt rose to about 81 percent of GDP, from
about 65.5 percent in 2019. The current account surplus rose to about 7
percent of GDP, driven by an increase of private sector saving relative to
investment.
A strong economic rebound is expected as the pandemic abates, with GDP
growing by 3.9 percent this year and 4.5 percent in 2022. However, the
outlook is clouded by significant uncertainty and risks are tilted to the
downside. Delays in mass vaccination and the spread of new virus variants
could require stricter containment measures with adverse economic effects.
Other risks include weak external demand and worsening financial market
conditions.
Executive Board Assessment
[2]
Directors commended the authorities for their swift, substantial, and
coordinated policy response. The anti-crisis measures have mitigated the
economic and social consequences of the pandemic, including by preserving
jobs and providing liquidity and income support to firms and households.
The recovery is expected to be driven by a rebound in consumption and
investment, including public investment supported by EU funds. Uncertainty
around the outlook is high and there are downside risks, mainly related to
epidemiological developments.
Directors recommended maintaining the strong fiscal support in the near
term, with well-targeted policies that are continuously assessed and
adjusted to the evolving conditions. Once the recovery is entrenched, the
emergency measures should be withdrawn, and the focus should shift toward
consolidation. The large fiscal deficit should be reduced gradually over
the medium term to maintain buffers, and fiscal rules should continue to
play a strong role. The ambitious public investment plans call for improved
public finance management to mitigate execution risks.
Although bankruptcies have not increased so far, risks to financial
stability have risen. Directors stressed the need for continuing the close
monitoring of banks’ asset quality. Given that the exit from loan moratoria
has started, the phasing out of measures should be gradual and
well-coordinated to avoid cliff-edge effects. Macroprudential policies
should continue to be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure an appropriate
balance between financial stability and the need for credit to the economy.
The pandemic has had an uneven impact on employment. Directors encouraged
the authorities to continue to adapt policies to facilitate labor
reallocation and provide support to those affected the most―low-skilled
workers, women and youth. Active labor market programs could effectively be
used to help transition between jobs. These programs could be supplemented
with measures to improve the business environment and to strengthen the
social safety net.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ focus on digitalization and climate
change mitigation. Improving the digital infrastructure, building human
capital, and promoting digital inclusion would boost productivity and
resilience. The goal of reaching carbon neutrality by 2050 would be best
achieved by combining investment in green technologies with taxation of
polluting industries. The Next Generation EU instrument could play a key
role in Slovenia’s digital and green transformation.
|
Slovenia: Selected Economic Indicators, 2018–23
(Annual percentage change, unless indicated otherwise)
|
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staff Projections
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (EUR millions)
|
45,863
|
48,393
|
|
46,297
|
48,522
|
51,444
|
54,138
|
|
|
GDP per Capita (EUR)
|
22,189
|
23,255
|
|
22,090
|
23,061
|
24,377
|
25,607
|
|
|
Real economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP
|
4.4
|
3.2
|
|
-5.5
|
3.9
|
4.5
|
3.6
|
|
|
Domestic demand (contribution to growth)
|
5.0
|
3.4
|
|
-5.9
|
4.3
|
4.9
|
3.9
|
|
|
Private consumption
|
3.6
|
4.8
|
|
-9.8
|
4.3
|
4.6
|
3.7
|
|
|
Public consumption
|
3.0
|
1.7
|
|
1.8
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
0.5
|
|
|
Gross capital formation
|
10.3
|
1.5
|
|
-5.8
|
9.8
|
10.4
|
8.4
|
|
|
Net exports (contribution to growth)
|
-0.1
|
0.1
|
|
0.4
|
-0.5
|
-0.4
|
-0.3
|
|
|
Exports of goods and services
|
6.3
|
4.1
|
|
-8.7
|
8.8
|
6.0
|
3.8
|
|
|
Imports of goods and services
|
7.2
|
4.4
|
|
-10.2
|
10.5
|
7.1
|
4.5
|
|
|
Output gap (in percent of potential GDP)
|
0.3
|
0.6
|
|
-4.5
|
-3.5
|
-1.8
|
-1.0
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer prices (national definition,
period average)
|
1.7
|
1.6
|
|
-0.1
|
0.6
|
1.2
|
1.5
|
|
|
Employment and wages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (in percent, ILO
definition)
|
5.1
|
4.5
|
|
5.0
|
5.3
|
4.9
|
4.8
|
|
|
Real wages (all sectors)
|
1.6
|
2.7
|
|
6.0
|
4.0
|
3.1
|
2.8
|
|
|
Public finance (percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General government balance 1/
|
0.7
|
0.4
|
|
-8.4
|
-8.0
|
-4.8
|
-3.3
|
|
|
Structural balance 2/
|
0.3
|
0.0
|
|
-6.3
|
-6.3
|
-3.9
|
-2.7
|
|
|
Structural primary balance 2/
|
2.3
|
1.7
|
|
-4.7
|
-4.9
|
-2.7
|
-1.7
|
|
|
General government debt 3/
|
70.3
|
65.6
|
|
80.8
|
81.8
|
80.5
|
79.7
|
|
|
Monetary and financial indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit to the private sector
|
2.5
|
3.4
|
|
-0.2
|
5.3
|
6.3
|
5.8
|
|
|
Lending rates 4/
|
2.1
|
1.6
|
|
1.8
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Deposit rates 5/
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
|
0.1
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Balance of payments (percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade balance (goods and services)
|
8.5
|
8.5
|
|
9.7
|
8.8
|
8.5
|
7.9
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
5.8
|
5.6
|
|
7.1
|
6.5
|
6.3
|
6.1
|
|
|
Gross external debt (percent of GDP,
end-period)
|
91.9
|
90.5
|
|
104.1
|
103.1
|
98.2
|
94.8
|
|
|
Nominal effective exchange rate (2010=100)
|
105.2
|
104.8
|
|
106.9
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Real effective exchange rate (2010=100,
CPI-based)
|
97.9
|
97.2
|
|
97.8
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
Sources: Slovenia authorities and IMF staff
calculations and projections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/ Accrual basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/ Excludes one-offs and adjusted for the
output gap and calendar year shifts between
receipt and expenditure of earmarked EU
funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/ Includes EUR 1.1 bn in 2013 and EUR 0.7
bn in 2014 of debt issuance of the Bank
Asset Management Company (BAMC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/ Floating or up-to-one-year fixed rate
for new loans to non-financial corporations
over 1 million euros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/ For household time deposits with
maturity up to one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summing up can be found here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.