Washington, DC:
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved today
a disbursement of US$88.327 million (SDR 69.40 million) under the
Food Shock Window
of the Rapid Credit Facility to help Malawi address urgent balance of
payment needs related to the global food crisis. Food insecurity in Malawi
has increased significantly owing to multiple tropical storms,
below-average crop production, and increasing prices for food and
agricultural inputs such as fertilizer and seed. As a result, about 20
percent of the population is projected to be acutely food insecure during
the upcoming 2022/23 lean season (October 2022-March 2023), or more than
twice as many people as in 2021.
The authorities also requested the Staff-Monitored Program and Program
Monitoring with Board involvement to build a track record of policy
implementation, possibly paving the way to an IMF-supported Upper Credit
Tranche (UCT)-quality program. The Board and Management welcomed the steps
the authorities have taken since
the Article IV Consultation in December 2021
to stabilize the economy and build the foundation for inclusive growth.
Following the Executive Board’s discussion, Mr. Bo Li, Deputy Managing
Director and acting Chair, issued the following statement:
Malawi is facing a challenging economic and humanitarian situation, with
foreign exchange shortages and an exchange rate misalignment leading to a
sharp decline in imports including fuel, fertilizer, medicine, and food.
Emergency financial assistance under the RCF’s new food shock window would
help address urgent balance-of-payments needs and mitigate the impact of
the food shock.
The Management-approved staff monitored program (SMP) is sufficiently
robust to meet the authorities’ stated objectives, and its implementation
is expected to achieve the purpose of building a track record toward an
Upper Credit Tranche (UCT) -quality program supported by a Fund
arrangement.
Malawi’s track-record building SMP will benefit from limited Board
involvement given the ongoing concerted international effort by creditors
and donors to provide substantial new financing and debt relief to Malawi,
as well as Malawi’s significant outstanding Fund credit under emergency
financing instruments.
Fiscal discipline, supported by a realistic budget, an enhanced Public
Financial Management system and timely production of comprehensive fiscal
reports, is important. Restoring price stability and ensuring financial
sector stability will help build a foundation for private sector-led
growth.
Rebuilding external buffers will be critically important to reduce Malawi’s
vulnerabilities to external shocks. The RBM’s commitment to rebuild its
foreign exchange reserves, requiring implementation of its strategy to wind
down unsustainable policies including excessive use of swaps and trade
credit to maintain strategic imports and other quasi-fiscal operations, is
welcome.
While debt is sustainable on a forward-looking basis, risks to the program
are high. It will be critical to swiftly implement the authorities’ debt
restructuring strategy, which aims to bring Malawi back to moderate risk of
debt distress in the medium term. The credible process underway to
restructure the authorities’ debt to commercial creditors, which in itself
would restore debt sustainability albeit with high risk, is welcome. Swift
progress is also needed on the reprofiling of official bilateral debt. A
concerted effort among the authorities, their creditors and the
international development partners will be crucial to ensure a successful
implementation of the debt restructuring strategy.
Addressing weaknesses in governance and institutions and enhancing
transparency will be important. In this regard, strong corrective actions
to address the issues that led to misreporting under the 2018 ECF,
including implementation of the recommendations of the 2021 safeguards
assessment, and measures to strengthen foreign exchange reserve management
are welcome. The authorities are urged to move to a UCT-quality program as
soon as feasible.
[1]
The Food Shock Window provides, for a period of a year, a new
channel for emergency Fund financing to member countries that have
urgent balance of payment needs due to acute food insecurity, a
sharp increase in their food import bill, or a shock to their
cereal exports.
[2]
SMPs are informal agreements between national authorities and IMF
staff to monitor the authorities’ economic program. As such, they
do not entail endorsement by the IMF Executive Board. Under recent
reforms to the policy on staff monitored programs, the Executive
Board, in specified circumstances, has limited involvement, not
amounting to endorsement of the policy program. In such cases, the
Board’s role is limited to (i) opining on the robustness of the
member’s policy program to meet the objectives stated in the
Management approved SMP and to achieve the purpose of building or
rebuilding a track record toward a UCT-quality program, and (2) in
the context of reviews, to indicate if the member is on track to
achieve these objectives.