Washington, DC: The Executive Board of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation
[1]
with the People’s Republic of China on January 10, 2024.
China’s economic activity rebounded in 2023 following the post‑COVID
reopening with real GDP estimated to have grown broadly in line with the
authorities’ growth target of around 5 percent. The recovery was driven by
domestic demand, particularly private consumption, and assisted by
supportive macroeconomic policies, including further relaxation of monetary
policy, tax relief for firms and households, and fiscal spending on
disaster relief.
[2]
Looking ahead, growth is projected to slow to 4.6 percent in 2024 amid the
ongoing weakness in the property sector and subdued external demand. Over
the medium term, growth is projected to gradually decline further and is
projected at about 3½ percent in 2028 amid headwinds from weak productivity
and population aging. While inflation fell in 2023 largely on account of
lower energy and food prices, it is expected to increase gradually to 1.3
percent in 2024 as the output gap narrows and the base effects of commodity
prices recede.
Uncertainty surrounding the outlook is high, particularly given the
existing large imbalances and associated vulnerabilities.
Deeper-than-expected contraction in the property sector could further weigh
on private demand and worsen confidence, amplify local government fiscal
strains, and result in disinflationary pressures and adverse
macro‑financial feedback loops. Greater-than-expected weakening of external
demand, tightening of global conditions, and increased geopolitical
tensions also pose considerable downside risks. On the upside, decisive
policy action, including faster restructuring in the property sector, could
boost confidence and lead to a better‑than‑expected rebound in private
investment.
Executive Board Assessment[3]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They
welcomed China’s strong post pandemic recovery, while noting that the
ongoing adjustment in the property market and strains in local government
public finance will continue to weigh on private investment and consumer
confidence. Directors concurred that continued macroeconomic support and
pro market structural reforms are needed to mitigate downside risks and
boost prospects for high quality, green, and balanced growth.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ efforts to contain risks from the
property market and underscored the need for additional measures in a
comprehensive, well sequenced strategy to facilitate a smooth transition of
the property sector to a new equilibrium. They called for accelerating exit
of nonviable property developers, allocating additional funding for housing
completion, assisting viable developers to repair their balance sheets and
adapt to a smaller property market, and allowing for greater market‑based
price adjustment.
Directors emphasized the need to close local government fiscal gaps and
contain their debt risks and welcomed the authorities’ policy package in
this regard. Directors highlighted the importance of progressive tax
reforms, public financial management reforms, and improved risk sharing
between the local and central government. They noted that reducing the
stock of local government debt would require greater use of insolvency
tools and enhancements in the financial safety net.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ focus on risk prevention and control in
the financial system. They recommended strengthening and strictly applying
prudential policies and removing forbearance measures to incentivize the
recognition of nonperforming assets. They underscored that a strategy to
address weak banks and strengthen the legal framework for bank resolution,
along with measures to enhance the financial safety net and crisis
preparedness capacity, would safeguard macro financial stability. In this
context, Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to strengthen
financial regulation and supervision. They also suggested continuing to
strengthen the AML/CFT framework.
Directors agreed that macroeconomic policies should support activity in the
near term. They recommended a budget neutral reorientation of expenditures
toward households to support consumption, and additional monetary easing via
interest rates, as well as reforms to the monetary policy framework to
enhance transmission. Greater exchange rate flexibility would help absorb
external shocks and improve monetary policy transmission.
Directors welcomed the authorities’ emphasis on more sustainable drivers of
quality growth and their commitment to ensuring a level playing field to
attract investment. They recommended lowering barriers to firm entry and
exit, accelerating SOE reforms, and relying more on market‑based allocation
of resources to boost productivity and potential growth. They underscored
that expanding the social safety net would durably reduce the need for
precautionary savings and support safer and more balanced growth.
Strengthening labor market and education policies would also be important
to boost productivity growth. Directors welcomed the authorities’ strong
commitment to achieving carbon neutrality and the efforts they are making
toward this end. They looked forward to the continued implementation of
their climate policies.
Directors highlighted China’s role in advancing multilateral economic
cooperation and welcomed its support for sovereign debt restructuring in low
income and vulnerable countries and addressing the global climate crisis.
Directors emphasized China’s key role in strengthening the multilateral
trading system. They generally agreed that scaling back the use of
industrial policies and trade restrictions would be important to avoid
cross border spillovers and help lessen fragmentation pressures.
Directors emphasized that addressing remaining data gaps would help enhance
data transparency and facilitate policy making.
It is expected that the next Article IV consultation with the People’s
Republic of China will be held on the standard 12‑month cycle.
|
China: Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
2025
|
2026
|
2027
|
2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Est. Projections
|
|
|
(Annual percentage change, unless otherwise indicated)
|
|
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP (base=2015)
|
6.75
|
6.0
|
2.2
|
8.4
|
3.0
|
5.4
|
4.6
|
4.0
|
3.8
|
3.6
|
3.4
|
|
Total domestic demand
|
7.42
|
5.3
|
1.7
|
6.8
|
2.7
|
6.2
|
5.2
|
4.1
|
3.9
|
3.7
|
3.5
|
|
Consumption
|
7.91
|
6.3
|
-0.3
|
9.0
|
2.0
|
8.4
|
5.5
|
4.3
|
4.1
|
4.0
|
3.7
|
|
Fixed investment
|
7.34
|
5.3
|
3.4
|
3.2
|
3.4
|
4.8
|
4.4
|
4.0
|
3.6
|
3.3
|
3.2
|
|
Net exports (contribution)
|
-0.49
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
1.8
|
0.4
|
-0.5
|
-0.4
|
0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
Total capital formation (percent of GDP)
|
43.96
|
43.1
|
42.9
|
43.3
|
43.5
|
42.3
|
42.1
|
41.9
|
41.7
|
41.6
|
41.6
|
|
Gross national saving (percent of GDP) 1/
|
44.14
|
43.8
|
44.5
|
45.3
|
45.7
|
43.7
|
43.4
|
43.1
|
42.8
|
42.5
|
42.3
|
|
Output gap estimate
|
-0.50
|
-1.0
|
-3.6
|
-1.5
|
-2.8
|
-1.4
|
-0.5
|
-0.2
|
-0.1
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LABOR MARKET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment rate (year-end) 2/
|
4.90
|
5.2
|
5.2
|
5.1
|
5.5
|
5.2
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer prices (average)
|
1.93
|
2.9
|
2.5
|
0.9
|
1.9
|
0.4
|
1.3
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
Consumer prices (end of period)
|
1.78
|
4.5
|
0.2
|
1.4
|
1.8
|
0.1
|
1.8
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
GDP Deflator
|
|
2.1
|
1.3
|
3.0
|
2.2
|
-1.1
|
1.5
|
1.8
|
1.9
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-day repo rate (percent)
|
4.58
|
3.0
|
2.7
|
2.2
|
2.3
|
1.9
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
|
10 year government bond rate (percent)
|
4.62
|
3.7
|
3.2
|
3.0
|
3.1
|
2.8
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MACRO-FINANCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total social financing
|
10.26
|
10.7
|
13.3
|
10.3
|
9.6
|
9.3
|
8.9
|
7.3
|
6.9
|
6.8
|
6.7
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
247.92
|
254
|
278
|
274
|
286
|
300
|
307
|
312
|
315
|
319
|
322
|
|
Total nonfinancial sector debt 3/
|
10.79
|
10.8
|
13.2
|
10.4
|
9.8
|
9.4
|
9.2
|
7.5
|
7.1
|
7.0
|
6.8
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
248.25
|
254
|
278
|
277
|
284
|
295
|
301
|
305
|
308
|
311
|
312
|
|
Domestic credit to the private sector
|
8.62
|
8.7
|
10.8
|
8.4
|
8.3
|
7.7
|
7.8
|
5.5
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
5.1
|
|
In percent of GDP
|
161.24
|
162
|
173
|
168
|
173
|
179
|
182
|
182
|
180
|
180
|
179
|
|
Household debt (percent of GDP)
|
52.30
|
55.8
|
61.6
|
62.1
|
62.2
|
63.9
|
62.8
|
62.2
|
62.0
|
61.9
|
62.0
|
|
Non-financial corporate domestic debt (percent of GDP)
|
108.94
|
106
|
112
|
106
|
111
|
115
|
119
|
119
|
118
|
118
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL BUDGETARY GOVERNMENT (Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Net lending/borrowing 4/
|
-4.28
|
-6.1
|
-9.7
|
-6.0
|
-7.5
|
-7.5
|
-7.4
|
-7.4
|
-7.6
|
-7.8
|
-8.0
|
|
Revenue
|
28.99
|
28.1
|
25.7
|
26.6
|
25.9
|
26.5
|
26.7
|
26.8
|
27.0
|
27.2
|
27.3
|
|
Additional financing from land sales
|
2.84
|
2.9
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
|
Expenditure
|
33.28
|
34.2
|
35.4
|
32.7
|
33.4
|
34.0
|
34.1
|
34.2
|
34.6
|
34.9
|
35.3
|
|
Debt
|
36.50
|
38.5
|
45.4
|
46.9
|
50.6
|
55.3
|
58.7
|
62.1
|
65.7
|
69.4
|
73.4
|
|
Structural balance
|
-4.14
|
-5.8
|
-8.8
|
-5.7
|
-6.7
|
-7.1
|
-7.3
|
-7.3
|
-7.6
|
-7.8
|
-8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (Percent of GDP)
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
0.17
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
2.0
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
1.2
|
1.0
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
|
Trade balance
|
2.75
|
2.7
|
3.4
|
3.2
|
3.7
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
3.5
|
3.4
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
|
Services balance
|
-2.11
|
-1.8
|
-1.0
|
-0.6
|
-0.5
|
-1.3
|
-1.4
|
-1.6
|
-1.6
|
-1.7
|
-1.8
|
|
Net international investment position
|
15.23
|
16.0
|
15.4
|
12.3
|
14.2
|
15.6
|
16.0
|
16.2
|
16.3
|
16.3
|
16.2
|
|
Gross official reserves (billions of U.S. dollars)
|
3167.99
|
3,223
|
3,357
|
3,427
|
3,307
|
3,299
|
3,450
|
3,572
|
3,642
|
3,714
|
3,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMORANDUM ITEMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (billions of RMB) 5/
|
91577.43
|
99,071
|
102,563
|
114,528
|
120,502
|
125,544
|
133,244
|
141,013
|
149,076
|
157,533
|
166,113
|
|
Augmented debt (percent of GDP) 6/
|
80.85
|
86.3
|
98.8
|
100.8
|
107.7
|
116.2
|
122.0
|
127.5
|
132.8
|
137.7
|
142.6
|
|
Augmented net lending/borrowing (percent of GDP) 6/
|
-9.40
|
-12.5
|
-17.0
|
-12.1
|
-13.4
|
-13.6
|
-13.3
|
-13.0
|
-12.8
|
-12.6
|
-12.4
|
|
Change in Augmented Cyclically-Adjusted Primary Balance 7/
|
2.07
|
-3.1
|
-2.6
|
3.9
|
-0.8
|
-0.1
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources: Bloomberg; CEIC Data Company Limited; IMF
International Financial Statistics database; and IMF staff
estimates and projections.
|
|
1/ 2021 GDP will be revised to match official revisions,
once full official data are released.
|
|
2/ Surveyed unemployment rate.
|
|
3/ Includes government funds.
|
|
4/ Adjustments are made to the authorities' fiscal budgetary
balances to reflect consolidated general budgetary
government balance, including government-managed funds,
state-administered SOE funds, adjustment to the
stabilization fund, and social security fund.
|
|
5/ Expenditure side nominal GDP.
|
|
6/ The augmented balance expands the perimeter of government
to include government-guided funds and the activity of local
government financing vehicles (LGFVs).
7/ In percent of potential GDP.
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff
team visits the country, collects economic and financial
information, and discusses with officials the country's economic
developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff
prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the
Executive Board.
[2]
The projections presented in the Press Release were based on
information available as of January 5, 2024. See the
IMF country page
for latest projections.
[3]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.