Elements of Effective Policies for Crypto Assets
Policy Papers, February 23, 2023
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Elements of Effective Policies for Crypto Assets
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: February 23, 2023
- Series: Policy Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400234392.007
Overview
- Purpose: Address questions by Fund members on how to respond to the rise of crypto assets and the associated risks.
- Core approach: Define and classify crypto assets based on their underlying features and describe their purported benefits and potential risks.
- Deliverable: Present a policy framework for crypto assets that aims to achieve key policy objectives such as macroeconomic stability, financial stability, consumer protection, and market and financial integrity.
- Caveat: The framework will not fix any underlying crypto design flaws (for instance, the lack of a credible nominal anchor, payments finality, or scalability).
Definitions and classification
- Crypto assets are defined and classified in the paper based on their underlying features.
- Classification supports tailoring policy responses to differing asset designs and functions.
Purported benefits and potential risks
- Purported benefits: (As described in the paper) potential efficiencies, innovation in payments and finance, and other claimed advantages tied to crypto asset designs.
- Potential risks: (As described in the paper) risks to macroeconomic stability, financial stability, consumer protection, and market and financial integrity.
Policy framework and key objectives
- Primary policy objectives the framework aims to achieve:
- Macroeconomic stability
- Financial stability
- Consumer protection
- Market and financial integrity
- The framework outlines key elements necessary to ensure these objectives are met (elements are framed around the definitions, classifications, and identified risks).
Limitations and scope
- Explicit limitation: The policy framework does not remedy inherent design shortcomings of some crypto assets (for instance, the lack of a credible nominal anchor, payments finality, or scalability).
- Focus: Policy measures aimed at mitigating risks and achieving policy objectives rather than altering protocol-level design flaws.
Content in this bundle
- Policy Paper