A Mirage, Not An Oasis: Easy Money and Financial Markets
IMF Blog, October 15, 2014
Source details
- Canonical URL
- A Mirage, Not An Oasis: Easy Money and Financial Markets
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Fabio Cortes, David Jones, Evan Papageorgiou
- Published: October 15, 2014
Overview
- Authors: Fabio Cortes, David Jones, Evan Papageorgiou
- Date: October 15, 2014
- Core message: Low interest rates and other U.S. central bank policies have driven investors into mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), creating an illusion of liquidity and a buildup of liquidity mismatches and credit mispricing risks.
Liquidity mismatch and market vulnerability
- Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds are the largest owners of U.S. corporate and foreign bonds, effectively channeling investor funds into corporate credit.
- Liquidity mismatch: investors can redeem fund shares almost anytime, while funds hold assets (for example, high-yield bonds) that do not trade as frequently.
- In benign conditions this mismatch is manageable; if the U.S. Fed begins raising interest rates—especially unexpectedly—large simultaneous redemptions could:
- Trigger asset price declines.
- Cause further selling and a vicious circle of losses and forced selling.
- Complicate a smooth exit from accommodative monetary policy and increase volatility in fixed income markets.
- Financial markets have shown increased sensitivity to price shocks since the crisis, particularly for credit products, increasing the risk of rapid selloffs.
Contributing structural factors
- Inflow liquidity (capacity to trade assets cheaply due to money inflows) has increased, while structural measures of liquidity such as depth and breadth have deteriorated.
- Concentration risks:
- A few fund managers hold large amounts of assets, creating “brand risk” from concentrated decision making.
- Increasing concentration of holdings in individual bond issuers.
- Reduced bank-provided liquidity: banks—traditional shock absorbers—are providing less liquidity.
- Hedge funds are more sensitive to asset price changes.
- Institutional investors are playing less of a countercyclical role.
Stress scenario and key statistic
- Scenario: An unexpected market adjustment that causes:
- Term premia in bond markets to revert to historic norms (a 100 basis points increase), and
- Credit risk premia to normalize (a repricing of 100 basis points).
- Impact estimate:
- Such an adjustment could rapidly push up bond yields and reduce the market value of global bond portfolios by over 8 percent — that is, $3.8 trillion.
Policy recommendations
- Officials should address liquidity mismatches using prudential measures.
- Example policy action: Remove incentives for runs by aligning redemption terms of funds with the underlying liquidity of the assets invested (i.e., match fund redemption features to asset liquidity).
Source: A Mirage, Not An Oasis: Easy Money and Financial Markets — Fabio Cortes, David Jones, Evan Papageorgiou, October 15, 2014.