Measure to Measure: The Effect of Fiscal Policy on Growth and Stability
IMF Blog, April 15, 2015
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Measure to Measure: The Effect of Fiscal Policy on Growth and Stability
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Vitor Gaspar
- Published: April 15, 2015
Overview and research questions
- Author: Vitor Gaspar
- Date: April 15, 2015
- Core questions addressed:
- Does fiscal policy respond systematically to economic activity?
- Can fiscal policy promote macroeconomic stability?
- Does greater stability support stronger growth?
- Summary answer given: "The answer is yes on all counts."
Novel metric: the fiscal stabilization coefficient (FISCO)
- Definition:
- FISCO measures how much a country’s overall budget balance changes in response to a change in economic slack (as measured by the output gap).
- Example interpretation: If FISCO is equal to 1 it means that when output falls below potential by 1% of GDP, the overall balance worsens by the same percentage of GDP.
- Empirical values:
- The average FISCO among advanced economies is 0.7.
- Cross-country differences are described as considerable.
- A referenced top-third FISCO level is about 0.8.
- Conceptual notes:
- The FISCO accounts for the fact that many revenue and expenditure items respond to the state of the economy even if they were designed for other reasons.
- Monitoring the relationship between the budget balance and the output gap helps policymakers understand how much their action contributes to output stability and allows cross-country comparisons.
Growth dividends from stabilization
- Mechanism:
- Higher FISCO → lower macroeconomic volatility → reduced wasteful fluctuations in employment and growth.
- Lower macroeconomic uncertainty → more favorable environment for physical and social capital → higher medium-term growth.
- Quantified example:
- An advanced economy raising its FISCO from the average level (0.7) to that in the top third of countries (about 0.8) would:
- Reduce output volatility by about 15 percent.
- Deliver a growth dividend of 0.3 percentage points annually.
- Methodology and caveats:
- The Fiscal Monitor provides greater details of the methodology, which attempts to address known challenges with growth regressions.
- Findings should be interpreted with caution, as with all econometric results.
Policy implications and practical measures
- Strengthening fiscal frameworks:
- Put in place a fiscal framework to manage public finance risks.
- Implement well-designed fiscal rules and medium-term frameworks to:
- Enable uninterrupted access to borrowing at favorable conditions.
- Ensure expenditure control over the entire cycle.
- Leave flexibility to respond to output shocks.
- Promote automatic stabilizers:
- Induce rules-like, automatic stabilizing responses to economic developments (e.g., tax payments that move with income, social transfers such as unemployment benefits).
- Rationale: Automatic stabilizers operate in real time without political approval or implementation lags, making them an effective way to make fiscal policy stabilizing.
Measure to Measure: The Effect of Fiscal Policy on Growth and Stability — Vitor Gaspar, April 15, 2015
Content in this bundle
- Now Is the Time: Fiscal Policies for Sustainable Growth, Fiscal Monitor, April 2015