Coronavirus Economic Planning: Hoping for the Best, Prepared for the Worst
IMF Blog, March 12, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Coronavirus Economic Planning: Hoping for the Best, Prepared for the Worst
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Martin Mhleisen
- Published: March 12, 2020
Economic risks and transmission channels
- Individuals infected by the coronavirus potentially face a blow to their health and personal and economic well-being.
- Countries hit by a sudden and unexpected public health emergency can see:
- slowed economic activity and squeezed budgets as they spend more to counter the impact of the virus;
- drops in revenue from falling economic activity;
- lower export revenues due to falling tourism receipts or a decline in commodity prices;
- an urgent balance-of-payments need if foreign exchange inflows and outflows mismatch.
- Even countries that avoid widespread contagion may experience faltering economic activity from spillovers via global developments or broken supply chains.
Role of the IMF and timely financial assistance
- The IMF provides policy and technical advice and can mitigate economic fallout through timely financial assistance.
- Emergency financial assistance, on average, accounts for 20 percent of IMF members’ requests for support.
- Swift financing can be essential to:
- replenish international reserves;
- obtain critical imports;
- boost budgets.
Past precedent: Ebola response
- When the Ebola virus devastated parts of Africa, the IMF provided concessional emergency assistance of US$378 million to Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, a total of 2.3 percent of their combined GDP.
- The IMF also provided debt-relief using funds from the IMF’s Catastrophic Containment and Relief Trust, which is being boosted by a £150 million contribution from the United Kingdom.
Emergency financing instruments
- The IMF has two emergency financing instruments for shocks, including large natural and health disasters:
- Rapid Credit Facility (RCF)
- Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI)
- Key features of these instruments:
- size, speed, and flexibility;
- disbursements are one-off payments meant to cover an urgent balance-of-payments need;
- not subject to traditional IMF conditions (contrast with multi-period Fund programs);
- the country must demonstrate that its debt is sustainable and commit to policies to overcome the emergency.
- Example: After Cyclone Idai swept through Mozambique, the Fund responded quickly to provide emergency support.
Quantified IMF response capacity and options
- In the event of a severe downturn triggered by the coronavirus, the IMF estimates it could provide up to US$50 billion in emergency financing to fund emerging and developing countries’ initial response.
- Low-income countries could benefit from about US$10 billion of this amount, largely on concessional terms.
- Beyond immediate emergency financing:
- members can request a new loan drawing on the IMF’s war chest of around US$1 trillion in quota and borrowed resources;
- current borrowers can top up their ongoing lending arrangements.
Policy message
- The IMF is supporting members by “hoping for the best” regarding the health emergency while being “prepared for the worst” through emergency financing and policy support.
Source: IMF blog by Martin Mühleisen, March 12, 2020.
References
- عربي
- 日本語
- Português
- economic fallout
- Catastrophic Containment and Relief Trust
- contribution from the United Kingdom
- Rapid Credit Facility
- Rapid Financing Instrument
- quota
- Monetary and Financial Stability During the Coronavirus Outbreak
- Fiscal Policies to Protect People During the Coronavirus Outbreak
- Potential Impact of the Coronavirus Epidemic: What We Know and What We Can Do
- Questions and Answers on the IMF’s $50 billion Rapid-disbursing Emergency Financing Facilities
- IMF Factsheet: How the IMF Can Help Countries Address the Economic Impact of Coronavirus