Pacific Island Airlines: Flying on Empty?
IMF Blog, August 18, 2021
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Pacific Island Airlines: Flying on Empty?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Vybhavi Balasundharam, Leni Hunter
- Published: August 18, 2021
Background and context
- Photo credit: Antonistock by Getty Images
- COVID-19
- Vybhavi Balasundharam, Leni Hunter
- August 18, 2021
- With virtually no international travel since March 2020, national airlines in the Pacific face mounting financial difficulties.
- Pacific Island countries rely on airline connectivity for tourism, education, employment opportunities, access to healthcare, and delivery of goods and services.
- Many Pacific Island countries have state-owned national airlines that cater to both domestic and international markets.
Market share and pre-pandemic performance
- National carriers are typically:
- the sole provider of domestic routes and a major provider of international routes.
- accounting for over 60 percent of the seat capacity in Fiji, Vanuatu, and Papua New Guinea, and 100 percent of the routes in Nauru.
- Financial losses and weak profitability were long-standing concerns for several Pacific airlines:
- Only Fiji Airways has made consistent profits over the past six years.
- Fiji Airways is the only national airline in the Pacific Island countries that is not fully government-owned (Qantas Airways has a 46 percent stake).
Restructuring history and vulnerability
- The majority of national airlines had at least a moderate overall risk rating prior to the pandemic.
- Many have already been through one or more restructurings and remain extremely vulnerable to external shocks.
- Example: Air Vanuatu was most recently restructured in 2016, following damages from Tropical Cyclone Pam, and is now undergoing another restructuring to recover from the COVID-19 crisis.
Government exposure and fiscal risks
- Governments are directly exposed to local airlines by virtue of state ownership and were often providing financial support even before the pandemic.
- Direct government support has been large relative to GDP in several cases, diverting resources from other development needs.
- Indirect support includes implicit guarantees on loans from financial institutions such as national provident (social security) funds.
- Governments have struggled to monitor and contain risks from national airlines due to:
- inadequate governance frameworks,
- lack of oversight capacity,
- lack of transparency from the airlines that undermines the ability to assess potential risks.
- The pandemic has forced governments to increase support of national airlines; for some, continued losses represent significant quasi-fiscal liabilities.
Outlook and recovery timing
- Tourism is unlikely to reach pre-COVID-19 levels prior to 2023.
- Given these conditions, airlines will struggle to improve financial performance in the near term.
Policy recommendations and governance priorities
- Recovery presents an opportunity to overhaul governance and oversight of national airlines to mitigate future risks.
- Priorities to mitigate risk to government balance sheets:
- Greater transparency and accountability in the running of national carriers.
- Rigorous oversight in the difficult months ahead.
- Transactions between the government and the national airline should be disclosed in the annual budget and in quarterly budget reports.
- Audited financial statements of the airlines need to be published in a more timely manner.
- Strengthen independent oversight units that monitor and mitigate risks from state-owned enterprises, including national airlines.
- Ensure sufficient capacity in oversight units, along with comprehensive governance laws and effective enforcement.
Engagement
- We want to hear from you!
- Click here for a 3-question survey on IMFBlog.
Pacific Island Airlines: Flying on Empty?, Vybhavi Balasundharam and Leni Hunter, IMFBlog, August 18, 2021.