IMF Lending Case Study: Jamaica

Source details

After gaining independence in 1962 Jamaica enjoyed strong economic growth and achieved middle-income status quickly; three decades later incomes started to plateau.
Jamaica experienced a massive financial crisis in the 1990s and a further setback after the 2008 global financial crisis.
Challenges cited include policy missteps that led to high public debt, vulnerability to natural disasters, emigration and brain drain, and high crime.
By 2013, Jamaica’s public debt had reached a historic high of about 147 percent of GDP.

In 2010 a debt exchange occurred; after another IMF-supported program went off track, by 2011 the country was on the verge of an economic meltdown with no access to international capital markets.
Jamaica turned to the IMF in spring 2013 for financial support and required a second debt exchange and a primary surplus of 7.5 percent of GDP to stabilize the economy and address structural challenges.
The Economic Program Oversight Committee was formed to bring together stakeholders from the private sector, unions, government, academia, and the media to hold the government accountable for reform commitments and fiscal discipline.
Finance Minister Nigel Clarke characterized the effort as shifting from an “IMF program” to “Jamaica’s program” with IMF support.
The arrangements comprised a 2013 Extended Fund Facility and subsequently the 2016 precautionary Stand-By Arrangement (signed with a new administration).
Over a six-year period the Jamaican authorities, with strong capacity-building support from international financial institutions and other partners, implemented reforms supported by the IMF.

Fiscal and external sustainability:
- Jamaica delivered a primary surplus in excess of 7 percent of GDP for six consecutive years.
- Public debt is down to below 100 percent of GDP for the first time since 2000/01.
- Tax reforms—supported by IMF and Inter-American Development Bank technical assistance, including administration improvements and a switch from direct to indirect taxes—generated significant dividends and allowed for some net tax cuts in the most recent budget.
Growth, employment, and social outcomes:
- The unemployment rate has reached 8 percent—an all-time low.
- Poverty is slowly declining, though still high.
- The economy has grown for 16 consecutive quarters, with accelerating pace as previously dormant sectors (for example, mining) begin producing.
Public spending:
- The IMF-supported reform program placed a floor on social spending that the authorities consistently exceeded.
- Capital spending, which had often been crowded out, was completed at about 98 percent of allocation, with major ongoing road work.
Financial sector and monetary framework:
- Several reforms supported by IMF technical assistance are completed or underway to strengthen securities dealers and the financial sector more broadly.
- Foreign exchange auction systems are being tested.
- Proposed amendments to the Bank of Jamaica Act are being considered to switch to inflation targeting.

Broad-based commitment to reform across political, public, and private sectors, together with support from international and bilateral partners, created the conditions to reverse unsustainable policymaking.
Strong program ownership, accountability mechanisms (such as the Economic Program Oversight Committee), and capacity-building support were central to implementing and sustaining reforms.
Continued commitment to reform and building necessary institutions for policy continuity are recommended to sustain higher economic growth as formal financial engagement with the IMF concludes.