Financial Markets and the Common Good
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Financial Markets and the Common Good
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: JOSEPH MCCARTIN
- Published: December 1, 2022
Overview
- Article: "Financial Markets and the Common Good"
- Author: JOSEPH A. MCCARTIN
- Publication: F&D Magazine
- Date: December 2022
- Summary focus: Review of Sanford M. Jacoby’s history of US labor’s strategies to mobilize pension-fund capital to influence corporate behavior.
Key findings
- 1970s belief: Labor activists thought mobilizing pension funds could "transform American capitalism" and modify corporate behavior.
- Early external expectation: Management guru Peter Drucker predicted “the accumulation of pension assets would bring socialism to the United States.”
- Main conclusion: Grand dreams of labor transforming corporate behavior through pension-fund investing “never materialized.”
Obstacles and contradictions identified
- Fiduciary duty constraint: Union pension fund trustees had a duty to maximize returns to ensure secure retirements for union members.
- Demographic and membership pressures: As union membership shrank after the 1970s, fewer unionized employers paid into pension funds, increasing pressure on trustees to maximize returns.
- Interest misalignment: Pensioners’ interests did not align neatly with those of active workers and unions; ensuring pensioners’ retirement security could conflict with activist investing.
Case study: CalPERS and the "cookbook"
- Actor: California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), described as the nation’s largest public employee pension fund.
- Period: 1990s
- Strategy: CalPERS codified a set of corporate governance principles—labeled the “cookbook”—advocated by pension funds.
- Cookbook principles included:
- limits on CEO pay
- board member independence from CEOs
- greater transparency in corporate financing
- Tactic: Pension funds pooled influence to advance these principles.
Outcomes and unintended consequences
- Mixed results from pension-fund activism:
- Failed to narrow the compensation gap between executives and their employees.
- Contributed to a shift in executive compensation from salary toward stock options.
- Stock options incentivized executives to downsize and outsource work as means of inflating stock prices (and their incomes).
- Pension funds’ shareholder activism helped legitimize the "shareholder value" worldview in equity markets.
- Systemic implications: The limitations of labor’s financial strategies were starkly revealed by:
- the 2008 crash
- the Great Recession
- the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial regulation legislation, which "largely failed to rectify the dysfunction that labor had fought for decades to correct."
Notable exceptions
- Examples of successful financial activism:
- Service Employees International Union (SEIU), through its Justice for Janitors campaign, deployed labor’s financial leverage to achieve breakthroughs.
Implications and assessment
- Overall assessment: Achievements of labor’s financial strategies "fell far short of grand 1970s dreams."
- Scholarly value: Jacoby’s volume is described as "unsurpassed as a starting point" for understanding both the urgent necessity and the enormous difficulty of making financial markets more accountable to the common good.
Source: Financial Markets and the Common Good — JOSEPH A. MCCARTIN, F&D Magazine, December 2022.
Content in this bundle
- Financial Markets and the Common Good