China’s Real Estate Challenge
Source details
- Canonical URL
- China’s Real Estate Challenge
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: KENNETH ROGOFF, YUANCHEN YANG
- Published: December 3, 2024
Overview
- Sliding property prices may presage a painful economic adjustment.
- Thesis: China is confronting a difficult transition from real-estate-led growth to more balanced growth, contrary to earlier consensus that any slowdown would be gradual and of little consequence.
- Historical context: China’s house prices rose tenfold since the early 1990s—far larger in magnitude than increases in Ireland, Spain, and the United States before the 2008–09 global financial crisis.
- Remaining differences noted: a one-bedroom apartment in the center of Beijing was still only 25 percent of a similar apartment in Manhattan; Chinese policymakers typically required down payments of 30 percent or more.
Key indicators of stress
- Home-price-to-income ratios in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Shanghai reached levels nearly double those of London and Singapore, and three times those of Tokyo and New York.
- Household-debt-to-GDP ratio: tripled from less than 20 percent in 2008 to more than 60 percent by 2023.
- Real estate and related demand accounted for 25 percent of China’s economy in 2021 (about 22 percent excluding imported content).
- Including infrastructure raises the share to 31 percent of the economy in 2021.
- Comparative benchmark: United States combines real estate and infrastructure at 18 percent.
- Per capita housing space in China now exceeds that of any major European country, while China’s per capita GDP is only a third as high.
- Tier 3 cities account for 60 percent of China’s GDP and have experienced falling prices in recent years.
- Rising ratio of construction projects outstanding to completed projects indicates increasing projects going into default, buyers pulling out, or properties under dispute.
Evidence for diminishing returns and measured impacts
- Two-decade buildup of construction—particularly since 2010 stimulus—may have produced diminishing returns to further real estate investment.
- City-level growth regressions covering about 300 Chinese cities find that cities with substantial existing real estate stock gain significantly less benefit from new real estate investment.
- Local consequences include greater problems with high local government debt where growth has not offset investment costs.
- Quantified impacts from prior and recent work:
- A 20 percent fall in the size of China’s real estate sector (aggregate input-output analysis) would lead to a 5–10 percent fall in output, cumulatively over a number of years, even absent a financial crisis.
- Diminishing returns on real estate can account for perhaps 2 percent of the slowdown in China’s growth rate (city-level regressions). This estimate is a lower bound as it does not incorporate financial fragility or consumption effects from further housing price declines.
Spatial heterogeneity and city-by-city findings
- Tier definitions used:
- Tier 1 cities: Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Shanghai.
- Tier 2 cities: provincial capitals and administrative cities.
- Tier 3 cities: smaller and generally poorer cities.
- Price evolution by tier:
- Tier 3 cities have experienced falling prices.
- Not all tier 3 cities are collapsing; some smaller southern cities are thriving, while many face outflows of young people and jobs.
- Measures of strain include ratios of outstanding to completed construction projects that have risen over time, signalling project distress and disputes.
- Analogy: Real estate distress can be geographically concentrated yet still trigger national financial strains (example cited: U.S. subprime problems concentrated in four or five states but leading to a nationwide banking crisis).
Transition challenges and policy-relevant observations
- The real estate sector (including related sectors) accounts for about 15 percent of employment, making absorption of displaced resources difficult.
- Repurposing construction for the green transition faces obstacles, including geopolitical frictions and political barriers to exporting low-cost electric vehicles.
- China’s strong central government and past competence (for example, handling corporate bankruptcies after 1994) had led many to expect an easier adjustment; evidence suggests China may not be as exceptional as previously believed.
- Observed consequences so far:
- A loss of confidence in real estate has significantly impacted consumption.
- Financial problems facing local governments are formidable.
- Authors refrain from detailed policy prescriptions in this piece, but highlight the likely sizable macroeconomic and fiscal challenges associated with a sustained real estate slowdown.
Kenneth Rogoff and Yuanchen Yang, "China’s Real Estate Challenge," F&D Magazine, December 2024.
Content in this bundle
- China's Real Estate Challenge