The Rewards of Rebalancing
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Rewards of Rebalancing
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: SONY KAPOOR
- Published: August 17, 2026
Overview
- Global investors are experiencing an accelerating "great rebalancing" as geopolitics reshapes the global economy and capital markets.
- The catalyst: concentrated risk from rising political and policy uncertainty in the United States.
- Deeper drivers: fading tailwinds behind US asset outperformance; misalignment between capital concentration and global growth; stronger policies in several emerging market and developing economies; converging risk profiles for advanced and emerging market economies.
Distorted capital map
- With just 4 percent of the world’s population, the US accounts for:
- about two-thirds of global stock market capitalization;
- nearly 40 percent of bond markets.
- The US accounts for:
- only 9 percent of global growth;
- 13 percent of trade;
- 15 percent of global economic output on a purchasing-power-parity basis.
- The Lucas paradox: global savings have flowed from younger, faster-growing economies to slowing, aging ones, inflating US asset prices and keeping capital scarce where it could diversify risk and raise productivity.
Diminishing tailwinds
- Historic US financial tailwinds now fading and likely to reverse:
- Declining interest rates, lower corporate taxes, quantitative easing, a strong dollar, fiscal indulgence, and a growing share of income flowing to capital over labor previously boosted US assets.
- Foreign investors tripled exposure to US equities to more than $20 trillion over the past decade.
- Evidence of a turn in the strong dollar cycle; weakening dollar increases attractiveness of emerging market and developing economies.
- Room for further cuts to US taxes and interest rates is limited; both are as likely to go up as down given the ballooning deficit and persistent inflation.
- The Federal Reserve is moving toward quantitative tightening, reversing the era of $9 trillion in peak asset purchases.
- Historic drivers of US corporate profit growth and valuations:
- "Lower interest expenses and lower corporate taxes alone explain more than 40 percent of the real growth in US corporate profits between 1989 and 2019."
- Lower risk-free rates explain expansion in price-earnings multiples over that period.
- Rising concentration and fragility:
- In the past three years, just seven companies accounted for 55 percent of total S&P 500 returns.
- The top 10 companies now make up 40 percent of the index.
- Gradual erosion of the traditional safe-haven status of US Treasurys.
Capital shifts
- Rebalancing begins at the margin; modest changes in large allocations have large macro impacts:
- Norway’s $2.2 trillion oil fund allocates 53 percent of holdings to US assets; trimming to 40 percent would free about $250 billion for investment elsewhere.
- Trillions in pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds could be redeployed:
- Some capital will flow to developed economies (United Kingdom, euro area, Japan).
- Emerging market and developing economies offer the most opportunity.
- Emerging market and developing economies contributions and dynamics:
- They have driven three-quarters of global growth in recent decades.
- China and India alone accounted for nearly half of global growth last year, three times the combined contribution of the US and the European Union.
- India and sub-Saharan Africa will each gain more than 12 million workers every year.
- Labor productivity growth in emerging market and developing economies is about 3 percent, more than three times the average for advanced economies.
The risk-return case
- Financial markets lag economic shifts:
- Emerging market and developing economies accounted for only about 11 percent of global equity market capitalization and 26 percent of bond markets at the end of 2025.
- Closing this gap would be macroeconomically significant:
- Reweighting could plug the annual financing gap of more than $4 trillion and lower financing costs for these economies.
- High cost of capital particularly hinders climate mitigation and adaptation investments.
- Convergence of risk profiles:
- Public debt: advanced economies 108 percent of GDP versus emerging market and developing economies 75 percent of GDP.
- Currency volatility and sovereign default rates have converged.
- Several emerging economies now have lower public debt ratios, more orthodox monetary policy, stronger reserve buffers, and greater policy predictability than many developed economies, including the US.
- Political risk in advanced economies (rising polarization and instability) narrows perceived safety differentials.
- Conclusion: Emerging economy investments now offer robust returns, limited incremental risk at the portfolio level, and large diversification potential as US outsize returns moderate and concentration risks rise.
Portfolio optimization
- Emerging market and developing economies provide structurally different returns (demographics, currencies, politics, policy regimes, sectoral composition) and generally lower correlations with developed markets.
- Modern portfolio theory implication:
- Assets should be judged by contribution to whole-portfolio risk and return, not standalone expected return.
- Many "global" portfolios are concentrated bets on US equities, Treasurys, the dollar, and a small group of tech companies.
- Rebalancing toward emerging economies can:
- Improve risk-adjusted returns for institutional investors bound by fiduciary duty.
- Lower financing costs for emerging economies, boosting investment, jobs, growth, and supporting a more resilient, low-carbon economy.
Policy implications and recommendations
- Rebalancing is inevitable but timeline is uncertain due to barriers:
- Weak project pipelines;
- Misaligned incentives;
- Perverse regulations;
- Investors’ general unfamiliarity with these markets.
- Top policy priorities:
- Remove barriers that slow capital reallocation to emerging market and developing economies.
- Strengthen project pipelines and align incentives and regulations to attract institutional capital.
- Expected outcomes:
- Unlock stronger, more balanced global growth;
- Reward investors with higher risk-adjusted returns;
- Potentially begin to address the Lucas paradox.
The Rewards of Rebalancing, SONY KAPOOR, September 2026, F&D Magazine.
Content in this bundle
- The Rewards of Rebalancing
- ch1
- ch2
- Working Paper