The Debate on the International Monetary System

IMF Staff Position Notes, November 11, 2009

Source details

Canonical URL

The Debate on the International Monetary System

Other formats

• Markdown version
• Structured JSON version
• Bundle manifest

Bibliographic details

• Authors: . Isabelle Mateos y Lago, Rupa Duttagupta, Rishi Goyal
• Published: November 11, 2009
• Series: IMF Staff Position Notes
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781462331369.004

Overview and central diagnosis

• The paper considers options to address concerns related to functioning of the International Monetary System.
• The current “non-system” is characterized by a dominant country-issued reserve currency with inherent weaknesses:
  • The reserve issuer runs fiscal and external deficits to meet growing world demand for reserve assets.
  • There is no ready mechanism forcing surplus or reserve-issuing countries to adjust.
• The problem has amplified in recent years in line with a sharp rise in the demand for reserves, reflecting in part emerging markets’ tendency to self-insure against costly capital account crises.

Main analytical themes

• Demand-side analysis:
  • Explores alternative insurance arrangements that could mitigate the precautionary demand for reserves.
• Supply-side analysis:
  • Assesses a menu of alternative reserve assets that could offer sustained stability and efficiency.
• Institutional and cooperation considerations:
  • Many proposals would require fundamental changes in the forms and degree of international cooperation.
  • Such proposals may gain realism and practical relevance if more incremental efforts at strengthening the current system fail.

Key findings and propositions (enumerated)

• The existing international monetary arrangement functions as a “non-system” with systemic vulnerabilities tied to a dominant reserve currency.
• Rising global reserve demand has amplified systemic tensions.
• Emerging markets’ precautionary reserve accumulation is an important driver of reserve demand.
• Both demand-side insurance instruments and expanded/diversified reserve asset options are viable avenues for reform.
• Fundamental institutional changes would be needed for many of the proposed solutions; incremental reforms are an alternative pathway but may be insufficient.

Policy considerations and implications

• Consider developing alternative insurance arrangements to reduce precautionary reserve accumulation by emerging markets.
• Evaluate a range of alternative reserve assets for potential to enhance stability and efficiency of the international monetary system.
• Recognize that meaningful reform may require deeper international cooperation and possibly structural changes to existing institutions.
• Treat incremental strengthening of the current system as a first step, with contingency plans for more fundamental reforms if incremental measures fail.

Publication and metadata (exact values preserved)

• Authors: Isabelle Mateos y Lago, Rupa Duttagupta, Rishi Goyal
• Date: November 11, 2009
• Pages: 25
• Volume: 2009
• Issue: 026
• Series: Staff Position Note No. 2009/026
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781462331369.004
• Stock No: SPNEA2009026
• ISBN: 9781462331369
• ISSN: 2617-6742
• Preview citation (format: Chicago): . Isabelle Mateos y Lago, Rupa Duttagupta, and Rishi Goyal. "The Debate on the International Monetary System", IMF Staff Position Notes 2009, 026 (2009), accessed 9/19/2026, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781462331369.004

IMF Staff Position Note: "The Debate on the International Monetary System", November 11, 2009.

Content in this bundle

• _spn0926 - Executive Summary
  • _spn0926 - Executive Summary (Markdown version)
  • _spn0926 - Executive Summary (PDF)