Adequacy of the Global Financial Safety Net—Considerations for Fund Toolkit Reform
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Adequacy of the Global Financial Safety Net—Considerations for Fund Toolkit Reform
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: December 19, 2017
Growing demand for liquidity and GFSN adequacy
- The global economy is experiencing a period of protracted uncertainty, marked by frequent episodes of volatility.
- Demand for liquidity has intensified, in particular from emerging markets, which are experiencing a build-up of vulnerabilities and the depletion of their fiscal buffers.
- The enhanced GFSN meets only partially this higher demand for liquidity.
- The IMFC and G20 have called on the Fund to further strengthen the safety net.
Uneven use of the Fund’s toolkit and stigma
- Despite a major overhaul of the Fund’s lending instruments available for precautionary financing, only a modest number of countries have used them.
- The lack of access to a liquidity backstop for members with strong policies—similar to the standing bilateral swap arrangements (BSAs) among central banks—limits the availability of Fund support over the whole duration of the shock during protracted periods of global uncertainty.
- The need to resort to Fund financing still carries a high political cost (stigma) for some members.
Proposed toolkit enhancements
- Consider establishing a new facility for precautionary financing that would provide a "standing" liquidity backstop to members with strong fundamentals and policies for use when hit by liquidity shocks.
- Consider adjusting the existing toolkit to maintain cohesion across instruments.
- Any change to the Fund toolkit would need to take into account the tradeoffs between reducing stigma and containing moral hazard, while simultaneously safeguarding Fund resources.
Fund policy monitoring instrument
- As the GFSN has expanded and become more multi-layered, there is a need to improve cooperation across the different layers to unlock financing and signal commitment to reforms.
- Creating a policy monitoring instrument that is available to all Fund members could help improve cohesion of the global safety net.
Next steps
- In light of Directors’ views on these points, staff could come back with subsequent papers that lay out specific and detailed proposals for reforming the lending toolkit.
- These subsequent papers focus on the GRA lending toolkit; a separate forthcoming paper will assess some aspects of the concessional lending toolkit.
Source: Adequacy of the Global Financial Safety Net—Considerations for Fund Toolkit Reform (December 19, 2017).
Content in this bundle
- Policy Paper