The Quality Effect: Does Financial Liberalization Improve the Allocation of Capital?
IMF Working Papers, June 1, 2004
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Quality Effect: Does Financial Liberalization Improve the Allocation of Capital?
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Abdul d Abiad, Nienke Oomes, Kenichi Ueda
- Published: June 1, 2004
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451853636.001
Summary
- The study documents evidence of a "quality effect" of financial liberalization on allocative efficiency, measured by the dispersion in Tobin's Q across firms.
- Based on a simple model, the authors predict that financial liberalization, by equalizing access to credit, reduces the variation in expected marginal returns.
- The prediction is tested using a new financial liberalization index and firm-level data for five emerging markets: India, Jordan, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand.
- Main empirical finding: strong evidence that financial liberalization, rather than financial deepening, improves allocative efficiency.
Methodology
- Theoretical approach: a simple model that links equalized access to credit with reduced variation in expected marginal returns.
- Empirical approach: construction and use of a new financial liberalization index combined with firm-level data from five emerging markets (India, Jordan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand).
- Key outcome variable: dispersion in Tobin’s Q across firms as a measure of allocative efficiency.
Key Findings
- Financial liberalization is associated with a reduction in the dispersion of Tobin's Q across firms.
- The evidence points to financial liberalization improving allocative efficiency, in contrast to financial deepening.
- The "quality effect" is identified as the mechanism by which liberalization equalizes access to credit and thereby reduces variation in expected marginal returns.
Policy Implications and Recommendations
- Policies promoting financial liberalization can enhance allocative efficiency by improving the distribution of credit access across firms.
- Emphasis on the nature of reform: liberalization (changes in access and constraints) appears more important for allocative outcomes than mere financial deepening (growth in financial size or volume).