Jurisdictional Capital and AI Regulation: Evidence from the EU AI Act
IMF Working Papers, August 28, 2026
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Jurisdictional Capital and AI Regulation: Evidence from the EU AI Act
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Yi Chen, Zhe Wang, Jing Zhou
- Published: August 28, 2026
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229060196.001
Overview
- Study of how AI regulation affects firm valuation using the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, described as "the world's first comprehensive AI framework."
- Event study centered on the April 2021 proposal to the EU AI Act.
- Authors: Yi Chen, Zhe Wang, Jing Zhou.
- Date: August 28, 2026.
Key findings
- Firms combining deeper EU presence with faster AI hiring earned higher announcement returns, indicating markets value "jurisdictional capital"—experience in the EU regulatory environment helps firms navigate the AI regulation.
- The effect is stronger for:
- high-risk AI,
- firms with stable and concentrated EU presence,
- firms with prior compliance experience.
- The results are not explained by size, foreign exposure, or lobbying.
- EU-embedded, AI-expanding firms increase within-firm EU revenue share when peers are less embedded.
Empirical approach and scope
- Method: Event study around the April 2021 proposal to the EU AI Act.
- Focus: Firm valuation responses to AI regulatory announcement; interactions between EU presence and AI hiring speed.
- Subject areas listed: Artificial intelligence (economics), Capital adequacy requirements, Compliance costs, Financial regulation and supervision, Foreign currency exposure, Money, Revenue administration, Technology.
Robustness and heterogeneity
- Stronger valuation effects documented for high-risk AI applications.
- Stability and concentration of EU presence amplify the valuation premium.
- Prior compliance experience further increases the effect.
- Alternative explanations tested and found insufficient: size, foreign exposure, and lobbying do not account for the observed effects.
Policy implications and interpretation
- Markets price "jurisdictional capital": firms with EU regulatory experience are better positioned to manage regulatory changes embodied in the EU AI Act.
- Firms expanding AI activities and embedded in the EU reallocate revenue toward the EU when peer firms are less EU-embedded, suggesting strategic geographic revenue shifts in response to regulatory landscapes.
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper