Macroeconomic Impacts of China’s Energy Transition
IMF Working Papers, August 28, 2026
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Macroeconomic Impacts of China’s Energy Transition
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, Gregor Schwerhoff, Sneha D Thube, Sha Yu
- Published: August 28, 2026
- Series: IMF Working Papers
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229060783.001
Summary
- Solar and wind power account for a growing share of electricity generation in China and now dominate new capacity additions.
- The power system transition toward renewable generation increases the need for greater flexibility to maintain system stability.
- The paper uses a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to assess macroeconomic implications of this transition.
- Model results indicate a modest increase in electricity prices in the near-term, followed by sustained declines as renewable shares rise, particularly when variability is managed through battery storage rather than coal-fired backup generation.
- The transition requires substantial adjustments in electricity supply and investment, raises GDP in the long run, and strengthens energy security.
- Battery-based flexibility outperforms continued reliance on coal across multiple dimensions, even when accounting for rising electricity demand from emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.
- The battery-centered transition pathway increases the risk of stranded assets in the coal power sector.
Model, Scope, and Methodology
- Method: Computable general equilibrium model (CGE models).
- Geographic focus: China.
- Sectors and topics: Electricity, Renewable energy, Non-renewable resources, Renewable resources, Environment, Commodities.
- Consideration of demand-side changes including rising electricity demand from emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.
Key Findings and Quantitative Points
- Near-term: modest increase in electricity prices.
- Medium-to-long term: sustained declines in electricity prices as renewable shares rise.
- Flexibility options compared:
- Battery storage management leads to better outcomes than coal-fired backup generation.
- Macroeconomic impacts:
- The transition raises GDP in the long run.
- Strengthens energy security.
- Structural and investment implications:
- Requires substantial adjustments in electricity supply and investment.
- Raises the risk of stranded assets in the coal power sector.
Policy Implications and Trade-offs
- Favor battery-based flexibility over continued reliance on coal to achieve stronger macroeconomic and energy-security outcomes.
- Prepare for significant electricity supply and investment adjustments during the transition.
- Anticipate and manage the risk of stranded coal assets through targeted policies (investment planning, retraining, and asset-transition measures implied by the findings).
Content in this bundle
- Working Paper