Back to the Future: The Nature of Regulatory Capital Requirements

Author/Editor:

Ralph Chami ; Thomas F. Cosimano ; Emanuel Kopp ; Celine Rochon

Publication Date:

August 4, 2017

Electronic Access:

Free Download. Use the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this PDF file

Disclaimer: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Summary:

This paper compares the current regulatory capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) and the 10-percent leverage ratio, as proposed by the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. House of Representatives' Financial CHOICE Act (FCA). We find that the majority of U.S. banks would not qualify for an "off-ramp"option—where regulatory relief is offered to FCA qualifying banks (QBOs)—unless considerable amounts of capital are added, and that large banks are much closer to the proposed leverage threshold and, therefore, are more likely to stand to gain from regulatory relief. The paper identifies an important moral hazard problem that arises due to the QBO optionality, where banks are likely to increase the riskiness of their asset portfolio and qualify for the FCA “off-ramp” relief with unintended effects on financial stability.

Series:

Working Paper No. 2017/181

Subject:

English

Publication Date:

August 4, 2017

ISBN/ISSN:

9781484313817/1018-5941

Stock No:

WPIEA2017181

Pages:

20

Please address any questions about this title to publications@imf.org