|
Coordinated Compilation Exercise (CCE) for Financial Soundness Indicators (FSIs)
FSI Metadata FSI Compilation Guide, March 2006 • English • Español • Français • Русский IMF Board Papers and Related Material on the CCE and FSIs Contact us See Also: Financial Soundness Indicators (FSIs) and the IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program Financial System Stability Assessment Global Financial Stability Report Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board (DSBB): metadata on SDDS and GDDS data categories |
|
|
|
The CCE participating countries are responsible for the accuracy of the FSI data provided to the IMF and disseminated in this website. The FSI Data webpage provides access to the FSI data submitted by countries participating in the CCE. Information can be viewed by country (participating in the CCE) and by topic (individual country tables). Content of Data Report Forms The DRFs contain the following tables:
Each of the above mentioned tables has at least three designated columns for various consolidation bases (i.e., institutional coverages) used for compiling FSIs. From these columns, the one on the left is used if the data in both the numerator and denominator of the FSI ratio are compiled on a domestically-controlled, cross border consolidation basis (DCCB); the column next to that is used if the data in both the numerator and denominator of the FSI ratio are compiled on a domestic consolidation basis (DC); columns to the right of the column labeled "Domestic Consolidation Basis" are used if one or both underlying data, in the numerator and denominator of the FSIs, are compiled on a basis other than DCCB or DC. If a FSI is compiled on more than one consolidation basis, and these bases are different from DCCB or DC, then data for these consolidation bases are provided in the columns to the right of the column labeled "Domestic Consolidation Basis." The DCCB and DC bases were chosen to appear in all DRFs as the DCCB is recommended by the IMF's Financial Soundness Indicators: Compilation Guide (Guide) for soundness analysis, while DC had been indicated in an early inventory survey as an option often used by countries and is a recommended institutional coverage for the sectors of OFCs, NFCs, and households.5 Tables A and B also provide direct access to the metadata for each FSI and underlying data series, respectively, which can be accessed by clicking on the FSI numbers (e.g., on I5) and on the underlying series numbers (e.g., on S7) displayed on the left hand side of the tables. Lack of reporting of certain FSIs in the CCE If a country decided not to compile a certain FSI, the entry in the data report form (Table A) has been left completely blank and, where applicable, the corresponding annex table (Annex Table A1, Annex Table A2) has been omitted. In these cases, no underlying data have been included in the Table B and, where applicable, the corresponding annex table has been omitted (Annex Table B1, Annex Table B2). In some cases countries have not reported, for confidentiality or availability reasons, underlying series for certain (or all) of the FSIs they report in the CCE. Reporting FSI (and underlying) time series data FSI time series data, which have been encouraged by the terms of reference of the CCE, are reported in Part G of the Metadata Questionnaire (Additional Information Relevant to the Compilation and Dissemination of FSIs), and not in the data report forms. FSI Data Comparability Participating countries were encouraged to follow the Guide's recommendations to the extent possible to foster comparability of data across countries. However, it is important to note that there may be deviations between a country's compilation methodology and the Guide, as well as among different countries' compilation practices, due to the specificity of a country's financial system, way of compiling certain FSIs, or source data availability. Several aspects should be taken into account while comparing data across countries, and certain important ones are captured in the way the data are presented in the data report forms. An important aspect relates to the fact that a number of FSIs can be compiled in more than one way by varying either the numerator and/or the denominator. For example, some FSIs that use capital either in the numerator or the denominator, can be potentially reported with capital being defined as the balance sheet concept of capital and reserves or alternatively as the regulatory concept of total regulatory capital or Tier 1 capital, or even the concept of narrow capital and reserves. In this regard, there is a variation in the following underlying data series: Capital (total capital and reserves; total regulatory capital; regulatory Tier 1 capital; and narrow capital and reserves); Net income (before extraordinary items and taxes; after extraordinary items and taxes); Liquid assets (core measure; broad measure); Large exposures (number of large exposures; lending to the largest entities in the economy; connected lending). The choices made by countries in these areas are provided in Table B of the DRF. Another important aspect to be taken into account in comparing data across countries concerns the type of consolidation basis (institutional coverage) used by countries to compile particular FSIs. Although the Guide recommends that a domestically controlled cross-border consolidation (DCCB) basis be used, countries could choose to compile FSIs using a variety of institutional coverages (consolidation bases) depending on country circumstances. Details on each type of institutional coverage (consolidation basis) are provided in Notes and Definitions. The choices made by countries regarding consolidation bases for their FSIs are provided in Tables A and B and their annexes. The adoption of a certain consolidation basis does not necessarily imply that the consolidation adjustments that are possible within the population implied by this institutional coverage actually take place. In some countries, some or all of these potential adjustments take place, while in others they do not (i.e., "solo" data are simply aggregated). Therefore, comparability of data could be affected by the extent to which countries carry out the possible consolidation adjustments, although data users should consider the quantitative significance of such adjustments in each case. There are two levels of consolidation adjustments--intra-group consolidation adjustments (i.e., those between the parent institution and its branches and subsidiaries) and inter-group6 consolidation adjustments (eliminations of certain--not all--flows and positions between the reporting groups in the population). In cases where the consolidation adjustments are not applicable for specific FSIs and underlying data series, this has been indicated accordingly in the metadata. More detailed information on consolidation adjustments and whether they are carried out by a given country for a specific FSI can be found in the FSI metadata page. There are other possible reasons for which FSIs that are reported under the same name can differ, such as the principles of valuation used, the mode of recording gains and losses, the extent that accrual accounting is followed, the boundaries of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet, the mode of recording of arrears, the identification of loan loss provisions, etc. The metadata compiled by countries for the FSIs reported in the CCE describe the choices countries have made in these methodological dimensions so as to permit an assessment of the comparability of different countries FSIs. Users of FSI data compiled for the CCE are therefore urged to refer to the metadata before engaging in comparisons of different economies FSIs. Besides possible methodological differences in the compilation of different countries FSIs, data users should bear in mind that different countries FSIs may also not be comparable because the circumstances across economies may differ. This is why the Guide clearly advocates that FSIs should be considered in the context also of (1) the broader picture of economic and financial circumstances of a country; (2) the institutional and regulatory framework for an economy, in particular through assessments of compliance with international financial sector standards; and (3) the structure of the country's financial system and strength of its financial infrastructure. 1) "Country" as used in this website does not always refer to a territorial entity that is a state as understood by international law and practice; the term also covers nonsovereign territorial entities, for which statistical data are provided internationally on a separate basis. 2) For certain specific FSIs (the spread between reference lending and deposit rates, the spread between highest and lowest interbank rate, the average bid-ask spread in the securities market, and the average daily turnover ratio in the securities market) the reference date or period within 2005 for which these indicators are calculated was left to the country authorities, who specified it accordingly in the data report forms. 3) Although the CCE only contemplated collection of data at a point in time, the system created has the potential to collect data with certain periodicity and timeliness. 4) The definition of advanced economies
should follow that of World Economic Outlook (WEO).
The content of the latest WEO list of advanced economies, as well as of the
geographical regions used in Annex Table A2 and in Annex Table B2, can be found
in: 5) The inventory survey was conducted by the IMF's Statistics Department in August-September 2004 so as to gather information from each country participating in the CCE on its starting point in the exercise. 6) Inter-group consolidation adjustments are also referred to as intra-sector or sector-level consolidation adjustments. Contact information: Please e-mail any questions or comments to StatisticsQuery@imf.org. |