Teleworking is Not Working for the Poor, the Young, and the Women
IMF Blog, July 7, 2020
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Teleworking is Not Working for the Poor, the Young, and the Women
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: Mariya Brussevich, Era Dabla-Norris, Salma Khalid
- Published: July 7, 2020
Overview and scope
- Study covers a large sample of advanced and emerging market economies using surveys compiled by the OECD for 35 countries.
- Estimate: nearly 100 million workers in 35 advanced and emerging countries (out of 189 IMF members) could be at high risk because they are unable to do their jobs remotely.
- This is equivalent to 15 percent of their workforce, on average.
- Work-from-home feasibility index is based on tasks actually performed within each country (not just U.S. occupation definitions).
Key findings on who is most at risk
- Sectors with the least teleworkable jobs:
- Food and accommodation
- Wholesale and retail trade
- More than 20 million people in the sample who work in these sectors are at the highest risk of losing their jobs.
- Country differences:
- It is much easier to telework in Norway and Singapore than in Turkey, Chile, Mexico, Ecuador, and Peru.
- More than half the households in most emerging and developing countries don’t even have a computer at home.
- Demographic and job-type vulnerabilities:
- Young workers and those without university education are significantly less likely to work remotely.
- Women are disproportionately concentrated in hardest-hit sectors like food service and accommodation and face heavier child care and domestic burdens.
- Part-time workers and employees of small and medium-sized firms face greater risk of job loss.
- In developing economies, part-time workers and those in informal work face a dramatically higher risk of falling into poverty.
- Distributional implications:
- Workers at the bottom of the earnings distribution are least able to work remotely; the COVID-19 crisis will exacerbate income inequality.
- Low-income workers are disproportionately concentrated in hardest-hit sectors and are more likely to live hand-to-mouth with little financial buffer.
Mechanisms amplifying impact
- Social distancing and lockdowns threaten jobs requiring physical presence or face-to-face interactions.
- Disruption of market provision of child care and domestic services increases the burden on women.
- Structural shifts in consumer behavior (more e-commerce, more takeout) may reduce demand for traditional retail and restaurant jobs.
Policy recommendations
- Short-term protection:
- Broaden social insurance and safety nets to cushion income and employment loss.
- Use wage subsidies and public-works programs to help affected workers regain livelihoods during recovery.
- Medium- to long-term measures:
- Strengthen education and training to better prepare workers for future jobs.
- Promote lifelong learning by bolstering access to schooling and skills training for displaced workers.
- Invest in digital infrastructure and close the digital divide so disadvantaged groups can participate meaningfully in the future economy.
Source: Teleworking is Not Working for the Poor, the Young, and the Women — Mariya Brussevich, Era Dabla‑Norris, Salma Khalid, July 7, 2020.