The Debt Pandemic – IMF F&D
Source details
- Canonical URL
- The Debt Pandemic – IMF F&D
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Authors: JEREMY BULOW, CARMEN REINHART, KENNETH ROGOFF, CHRISTOPH TREBESCH
- Published: September 1, 2020
Scope and immediate findings
- The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly lengthened the list of developing and emerging market economies in debt distress; for some, a crisis is imminent.
- Default rates are rising, and the need for debt restructuring is growing.
- Emerging market governments issued $124 billion in hard currency debt during the first six months of 2020, with two-thirds of the borrowing coming in the second quarter.
- Remittances from emerging market citizens working in other countries are expected to drop by more than 20 percent this year.
- Rising budget pressures have been accompanied by a new wave of sovereign debt downgrades, surpassing peaks during prior crises.
- History: a review of 89 default episodes from 1827 to 2003 shows the typical experience to be a sharp rise in borrowing, both external and domestic, in the run-up to default.
- Default episodes have taken, on average, seven years to resolve and typically involve multiple restructurings.
Role of multilateral lenders, official creditors, and private creditors
- The IMF, the World Bank, and other multilaterals acted quickly to provide funding as government revenues collapsed and private capital flows stopped.
- G20 creditors granted a debt moratorium to the world’s poorest countries and have encouraged private lenders to follow suit, with little success.
- Although official sector loans are theoretically senior to private sector claims, historical experience often shows private creditors extracting outsize shares of repayment.
- When private investors retrench, official lenders often step in; official creditors may end up bearing the bulk of losses even when they start with little of the outstanding debt.
- Private creditors increasingly use holdout and litigation tactics; as restructurings have declined, an increasing share of them have involved lawsuits.
Risks and outlook scenarios
- The riskiest period may still lie ahead: the first wave is not over; experience from the 1918 influenza pandemic suggests the possibility of an even more severe second wave, especially if it takes until mid-2021 (or later) for an effective vaccine to become widely available.
- Even in the best-case scenario, international travel will face roadblocks, and uncertainty among consumers and businesses is likely to remain high.
- The COVID-19 crisis could, in the worst case, lead to another “lost decade” in development, with long delays in debt resolution.
- Businesses in emerging markets have continued to accumulate foreign currency debt; under severe duress, governments may bail out corporate national champions, increasing public liabilities.
Preexisting conditions worsening debt workouts
- First preexisting condition: private creditors are increasingly claiming outsize shares of repayment in restructurings; analysis comparing haircuts taken by official and private creditors raises further doubt about official seniority.
- Second preexisting condition: debt crises tend to drag on; delay can lead to repeated restructurings, bargaining for larger official infusions, and “evergreening” of debt by creditors.
Practical policy recommendations to improve outcomes
- More transparency on debt data and debt contracts
- Strengthen transparency of debt statistics (World Bank, IMF, and G20 should insist on this).
- Increase disclosure on China’s bilateral lending where nondisclosure clauses currently obscure a full picture.
- Provide more granular data on private sector creditor exposure, including full disclosure on sovereign bond ownership and credit default swaps.
- Improve domestic accounts: better data on domestic debt, debt owed by state-owned enterprises, and pension burdens.
- Realistic economic forecasts that incorporate downside risks
- Adopt realistic growth forecasts to avoid underestimating near-term financing needs and overestimating a country’s capacity to service debt.
- Earlier detection of insolvency and identification of cases needing large write-downs can speed resolution.
- New legislation to support orderly sovereign debt restructurings
- National legislation in jurisdictions governing international bonds or payment processing can promote a more level playing field (examples in the text: UK 2010 law for HIPC participants; Belgium 2015 Anti–Vulture Funds Law).
- Legislation could cap amounts reclaimable from defaulted government bonds bought at deep discounts.
- Facilitate majority restructurings to allow a sovereign and a qualified majority of creditors to reach an agreement binding on all creditors subject to the restructuring.
Desired objectives and concluding position
- The global pandemic merits a generous response from official and private creditors toward emerging market and developing economies, including preserving the global trading system and helping countries weather debt problems.
- It is essential to ensure inter-creditor equity and fair burden sharing, especially between official and private creditors.
- The more official aid and soft loans can go toward helping needy citizens—and the less such assistance ends up as debt repayments to uncompromising creditors—the better.
Authors: JEREMY BULOW; CARMEN M. REINHART; KENNETH ROGOFF; CHRISTOPH TREBESCH.
Content in this bundle
- The Debt Pandemic – IMF F&D
- Pandemia de deuda por la COVID-19 ● Finanzas y Desarrollo ● Septiembre de 2020
- La pandémie de la dette