Speech: G-20 Seminar on Structural Reforms -- Opening Remarks by Managing Director Christine Lagarde
IMF News, February 26, 2016
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Speech: G-20 Seminar on Structural Reforms -- Opening Remarks by Managing Director Christine Lagarde
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: February 26, 2016
Overview
- Occasion: G-20 Seminar on Structural Reforms, Shanghai.
- Speaker: Christine Lagarde, Managing Director.
- Date and place: Shanghai - February 26, 2016.
- Framing: Structural reforms as central to recovery, medium-term growth, and longer-term sustainability; urgency given a fragile global recovery and considerable downside risks.
Context and macroeconomic challenges
- Global growth:
- Activity weakened unexpectedly at the end of last year, prompting the IMF to revise growth downward for this year and beyond.
- Growth in advanced economies remains modest.
- Some large emerging markets are showing signs of distress.
- China’s transition to a more balanced growth model has added to market volatility.
- Spillovers:
- Financial market unsettlements depress consumer and investor sentiment.
- Imperative:
- Need to boost both economic potential and confidence about the recovery and near-term growth.
- Call for a broad-based policy response that strengthens growth and reduces vulnerabilities.
Analytical framework and priorities for reform
- The IMF was asked by the G-20 to develop guiding principles and priorities for structural reforms from a macroeconomic perspective.
- Three economic dimensions identified as particularly important for successful implementation of structural reforms:
- A first dimension is a country’s income level.
- Research finds that for the more advanced economies, reforms that foster technology and innovation may have the greatest pay-off.
- For emerging market economies, strengthening property rights and capital markets may be more relevant.
- A second dimension is the country’s position in the economic cycle.
- Example: fiscal multipliers are larger when economic growth is below potential; in these situations, spending on infrastructure projects—for example, roads and bridges—is likely to have a larger growth pay-off in the near term.
- A third dimension is the country’s space for reform, which takes into account the distance from international best practice as well as the resource envelope available to finance reforms.
- Policy choices are also shaped by societal preferences (example: Anglo-Saxon vs Nordic “flexicurity” approaches to employment are both successful but based on very different labor market policies).
- Work is ongoing to refine the analysis and make these broad principles more operational.
Policy prescriptions and sequencing
- Combine supply and demand policies:
- Rationale: supply-side reforms can have short-term output costs; complementary demand policies can offset those costs and support employment.
- Example mechanisms:
- Demand policies boost firms’ expectations about future output when labor market reforms lead to job losses.
- Fiscal policy can support workers who get laid off.
- Empirical insight: when policymakers’ commitment to structural reforms is considered strong—e.g., when a “wave” of reforms is adopted—the effect of combined policy action is larger than the sum of its parts.
- Urgent actions called for:
- Speed up implementation of structural reforms committed under the G-20 growth initiative.
- All 188 IMF member countries are urged to undertake reforms that hold back their growth momentum and that were discussed in annual Article IV Consultations.
- Start-up question acknowledged: each economy is different; priorities depend on country-specific needs and political economy; invest political capital where it makes most sense given the three dimensions.
Role of international institutions and cooperation
- The IMF’s contributions:
- Surveillance: identifying the most macro-critical structural reforms that support growth and macroeconomic stability.
- Lending programs: focusing on the most macro-critical and feasible reforms within program constraints.
- Capacity building: technical assistance and training, especially in fiscal and financial sector structural reforms; demand for Fund advice in these areas is described as “nothing short of overwhelming.”
- Other international partners:
- OECD: noted for the “Going for Growth” framework; reference to its 12th annual report launched today.
- World Bank: provides advice reflecting decades of experience helping developing countries and emerging market economies design and implement structural reforms.
- Specialized organizations: ILO and UNCTAD can support reforms in their areas of expertise.
- Collaboration: IMF will work closely with partner institutions to support countries re-charging structural reform programs.
Political messaging and leadership
- Quoted guidance: Confucius — “When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don’t adjust the goals, adjust the action steps.”
- Call to action:
- Re-invigorate structural reforms across G-20 countries.
- Realize expected pay-offs from structural reforms earlier than initially anticipated due to fragile recovery and downside risks.
- IMF committed to supporting member countries, in coordination with partner institutions.
Opening Remarks by Christine Lagarde, Shanghai - February 26, 2016. IMF COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT.