Navigating Monetary Policy in the New Normal, Monetary Policy in a Changing Financial Landscape, Speech by Christine Lagarde at the ECB Forum on Central Banking
IMF News, May 25, 2014
Source details
- Canonical URL
- Navigating Monetary Policy in the New Normal, Monetary Policy in a Changing Financial Landscape, Speech by Christine Lagarde at the ECB Forum on Central Banking
Other formats
Bibliographic details
- Published: May 25, 2014
Overview and context
- Speech delivered at the first ECB Forum on Central Banking; date: May 25, 2014.
- Core aim: assess how the remit, independence, and operating environment of monetary policy should evolve in a post-crisis “new normal.”
- Three main themes addressed:
- (i) The evolving mandate of monetary policy;
- (ii) Monetary policy independence, given a possibly wider mandate for central banks; and
- (iii) The impact of growing financial interlinkages and challenges for monetary policy in emerging market and small open economies.
Theme 1 — The evolving mandate of monetary policy
Findings and observations:
- Pre-crisis consensus: monetary policy focused on price stability (low and stable inflation) with “light touch” microprudential regulation expected to deliver financial stability.
- The 2008 global financial crisis demonstrated that financial crashes can be extremely costly and that price stability alone is not always sufficient for output stability.
- Financial stability is now widely seen as an essential policy objective, but whether it should be part of monetary policy’s mandate is contested.
Empirical examples and exact figures preserved:
- Korea reduced banks’ short term external debt by half—to 27 percent—between 2008 and 2013.
- Hong Kong recently saw property prices level off and loan-to-value ratios decline (qualitative observation retained).
- In some countries (Israel, Switzerland, Turkey), credit growth and house price inflation remained high despite macroprudential measures.
Key practical questions and challenges:
- Transmission uncertainty: e.g., how much does a 100 basis points increase in interest rates deliver in terms of financial stability?
- Measurement ambiguity: how to define and measure financial stability—credit growth, asset price growth, leverage?
- Trade-offs in operating framework: raising rates to address financial imbalances versus lowering rates to support growth and inflation (example: Sweden shows less tendency to lower rates despite very low inflation because of rising financial stability risks).
Policy implication:
- Primary objective should be to strengthen prudential frameworks (macro- and micro-prudential tools such as loan-to-value limits, countercyclical capital buffers) to avoid overburdening monetary policy.
- Where macroprudential measures fall short, monetary policy may need a larger role to maintain financial stability.
Theme 2 — Monetary policy independence, given a wider mandate
Findings and reasoning:
- Central bank independence historically associated with better inflation performance; foundations are credibility and accountability built on three pillars:
- Clear mandate;
- Consistent performance;
- Consensus on objective.
- A wider financial stability objective challenges these pillars because:
- Objectives, targets, and instruments for financial stability are ill-defined.
- Performance is hard to measure and often revealed only after crises.
- Consensus may be fragile as some groups may lose from measures that enhance financial stability.
Institutional approaches and examples:
- Separate institutions for monetary and macroprudential policy (examples: Australia, Chile, Mexico) — use of committees for information sharing and coordination.
- Single-institution approach with safeguards (examples: ECB, Bank of England) — both monetary and macroprudential responsibilities with distinct governance structures to protect independence.
Policy implication:
- Institutional structures must protect the achievement of price stability while enabling macroprudential action; safeguards and clear governance are required if responsibilities are combined.
Theme 3 — Monetary policy independence in emerging market and small open economies
Findings and empirical evidence:
- Growing financial interlinkages and volatile capital flows pose challenges to monetary independence.
- Examples of exchange rate and capital flow volatility:
- Strong appreciation between January 2009 and May 2013: nearly 50 percent in New Zealand and Australia, and 30 percent in Chile.
- Reversal between May and August 2013: currency depreciations of nearly 15 percent in Brazil, India and Uruguay.
- Non-resident holdings of domestic currency government bonds in Uruguay surged from 2 percent to 45 percent of the outstanding stock in May 2013 (increase occurred in a little over a year).
Three-pronged policy response framework (not mutually exclusive):
- Resilience:
- Enhance resilience to shocks via sound macroeconomic fundamentals and reinforced macroeconomic and financial frameworks.
- Advanced economies can reduce volatility by communicating clearly about their monetary policy.
- Response:
- Use the full policy toolkit: monetary policy, exchange rate policy, macroprudential policy, fiscal policy.
- Consider targeted, temporary capital flow management measures and foreign exchange intervention where appropriate.
- Empirical examples: Brazil, Uruguay and Indonesia used some form of capital controls; India and Peru intervened in foreign exchange markets.
- Cooperation:
- International monetary policy cooperation can reduce the risk of tail events and large international feedback effects (examples: coordinated policy rate cuts during the crisis; Fed swap arrangements; G-20 agreement on expanding IMF resources).
- As conditions normalize, the urgency and clarity of cooperative gains may diminish, but uncertainties argue for continued evaluation of cooperative policies’ effectiveness and spillovers.
Policy implication:
- National policies alone risk ad hoc intervention and exported financial instability; international cooperation and careful evaluation of spillovers and “spillbacks” are important to limit global welfare losses.
Conclusion and next steps highlighted in the speech
- Several pre-crisis principles remain useful; others must be revisited in light of crisis lessons.
- The IMF commits to advancing analysis and debate on the contours of monetary policy in the post-crisis world, including through surveillance, cross-country analysis, and collaborative projects.
- Announcement: a new IMF lecture series on monetary policy in honor of Michel Camdessus; inaugural lecture by Janet Yellen on July 2 (as stated in the speech).
Speech by Christine Lagarde at the ECB Forum on Central Banking, May 25, 2014.