Washington, DC: The
Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the
first review under the ECF/EFF and RSF arrangements for Bangladesh,
allowing the authorities to withdraw the equivalent to SDR 352.35 million
(about US$468.3 million) under the ECF/EFF, and SDR 166.67 million (about
US$221.5 million) under the RSF. This brings total disbursements under the
ECF/EFF thus far to SDR 704.70 million (about US$936.6 million) and under
the RSF to SDR 166.67 million (about US$221.5 million). The Executive Board
also concluded the 2023 Article IV consultation with
Bangladesh.[1],
[2]
The ECF/EFF and RSF arrangements for Bangladesh were approved by the
Executive Board on January 30, 2023 (see
Press Release No. 23/25
) in an amount equivalent to SDR 2.5 billion (231.4 percent of quota or
about US$3.3 billion) under the ECF/EFF and SDR 1 billion (93.8 percent of
quota or about US$1.4 billion) under the RSF. The ECF/EFF arrangement has
helped preserve macroeconomic stability and prevent disruptive adjustments
to protect the vulnerable, while laying the foundations for strong,
inclusive, and environmentally sustainable growth. The concurrent RSF
arrangement has supplemented the resources made available under the ECF/EFF
to expand the fiscal space to finance climate investment priorities
identified in the authorities’ plans, help catalyze additional financing,
and build resilience against long-term climate risks.
Bangladesh economy has been buffeted by multiple shocks. Spillovers from
Russia’s war in Ukraine and global monetary tightening have interrupted a
strong post-pandemic recovery, with real GDP growth slowing to 6 percent in
FY23 and headline inflation reaching a decade high of 9.9 percent
year-on-year in August 2023. Due to strict import compression, the current
account (CA) deficit narrowed considerably (¾ percent of GDP in FY23
compared to 4.1 percent of GDP in FY22). However, an unprecedented reversal
of financial account, driven by global uncertainties and inadequate policy
response, has kept FX reserves and the Taka under pressure.
Real GDP growth is projected to remain at 6 percent in FY24 on the back of
relatively resilient exports, despite subdued private demand. Helped by
continued monetary policy tightening and neutral fiscal stance, inflation
is projected to moderate to 7¼ percent y‑o‑y by end-FY24, albeit slowly, on
account of elevated inflation expectations. The fiscal stance is projected
to stay neutral, with fiscal deficit at 4.6 percent of GDP in FY24
remaining broadly unchanged from FY23. The CA deficit is likely to remain
compressed at around ¾ percent of GDP in FY24, while the financial account
is expected to improve, including through timely repatriation of export
proceeds. FX reserves are expected to increase gradually in the near term
and are projected to reach about four months of prospective imports in the
medium term. However, uncertainties around the outlook remain high and
risks are tilted to the downside.
Following the Executive Board’s discussion, Ms. Antoinette Sayeh, Deputy
Managing Director and Acting Chair, issued the following statement:
“Bangladesh’s economy is navigating multi-faceted economic challenges.
Despite a difficult external environment, program performance has been
broadly on track, reflecting the authorities’ strong commitment. The
Fund-supported program is helping restore macroeconomic stability and
protect the vulnerable, while accelerating macro-critical structural
reforms to bolster growth potential and delivering on the climate agenda.
“Near-term policies should continue to focus on containing inflation and
rebuilding external resilience. This requires a calibrated monetary policy
tightening, supported by a neutral fiscal stance, and greater exchange rate
flexibility to alleviate foreign exchange pressures and rebuild buffers.
Ongoing reforms to modernize the monetary policy framework will improve
policy transmission and foster macroeconomic stability. Gradually
transitioning to a more flexible exchange rate regime and strengthening FX
reserve management would enhance external resilience.
“Raising tax revenues and rationalizing expenditures will allow increasing
social, developmental, and climate-related spending. Continued efforts to
enhance public financial and investment management are needed to increase
spending efficiency and mitigate fiscal risks.
“Financial reforms should focus on addressing vulnerabilities in the
financial sector, by strengthening banking regulation, supervision, and
governance. Deepening capital markets will help mobilize financing to
support growth objectives.
“Further trade liberalization and enhancements to the investment climate
will help bolster export diversification and foreign direct investment.
Raising productivity, including through education and upskilling, along
with increasing female labor participation, is pivotal to boost growth
potential.
“Building resilience to climate change and natural disasters is a priority
for achieving high, inclusive, and green growth. In this context,
strengthening institutions, improving climate spending efficiency, and
mobilizing climate financing remain crucial.”
Executive Board Assessment[3]
Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. They
noted that Bangladesh’s economy has been buffeted by multiple external
shocks. Directors noted however, that program performance is broadly on
track despite the difficult environment and welcomed the recent
implementation of corrective actions and the efforts to push key reforms
forward, including with support from Fund capacity development. Directors
stressed that near term policies should focus on containing inflation and
building external resilience, while mitigating the impact of these policies
on the most vulnerable. They also underscored the importance of addressing
structural challenges to support strong, inclusive, and green growth.
Directors called for a calibrated monetary policy tightening, supported by
a neutral fiscal stance, and for greater exchange rate flexibility to
restore near term macroeconomic stability and bolster external resilience.
They commended the authorities’ efforts to further modernize the monetary
policy framework, which will enhance policy transmission and help reduce
inflation. Directors also welcomed the adoption of a unified exchange rate
and stressed that a gradual transition to a more flexible regime is needed
to enhance the economy’s resilience to external shocks.
Directors emphasized that creating fiscal space for social spending and
growth enhancing investment is critical. They stressed the need to raise
tax revenues by implementing concerted tax policy and administration
measures. Directors also called for rationalizing subsidies, improving
expenditure efficiency, and better managing fiscal risks.
Directors underscored that advancing financial sector reforms remains
important to meet growing financing needs and support growth. They
emphasized the need to reduce banking sector vulnerabilities by
implementing NPL reduction and capital restoring strategies in state owned
commercial banks. Directors agreed that enhancing supervision and
regulatory frameworks, strengthening governance, and developing domestic
capital markets will help increase financial sector efficiency and mobilize
financing to support growth objectives.
Directors encouraged the authorities to expedite long standing reforms to
help Bangladesh reach upper middle income status. They emphasized that
liberalizing trade, enhancing the investment climate and governance,
upskilling the labor force, and increasing female labor force participation
are crucial to attract more FDI, diversify exports, and boost growth
potential. Given Bangladesh’s high vulnerability to natural disasters and
climate change, Directors underscored the need to improve climate
responsive public investment management and advance green public financial
management reforms. They noted that better management of climate related
risks will help enhance financial sector resilience and mobilize private
climate finance.
It is expected that the next Article IV consultation with Bangladesh will
be held in accordance with the Executive Board decision on consultation
cycles for members with Fund arrangements.
|
Bangladesh: Selected Economic Indicators, FY2020-2028 1/
|
|
|
FY20
|
|
FY21
|
|
FY22
|
|
FY23
|
|
FY24
|
FY25
|
FY26
|
FY27
|
FY28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Est.
|
|
Projections
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP(annual percent change)
|
3.4
|
|
6.9
|
|
7.1
|
|
6.0
|
|
6.0
|
6.6
|
7.1
|
7.2
|
7.0
|
|
|
Consumption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
|
3.0
|
|
8.0
|
|
7.5
|
|
3.6
|
|
5.7
|
6.3
|
5.7
|
5.7
|
5.7
|
|
|
Public
|
2.0
|
|
6.9
|
|
6.2
|
|
10.5
|
|
6.4
|
5.7
|
6.8
|
7.2
|
6.8
|
|
|
Gross Capital Formation
|
0.2
|
|
8.1
|
|
11.7
|
|
2.9
|
|
8.2
|
8.9
|
9.2
|
9.6
|
9.3
|
|
|
Private
|
0.2
|
|
7.8
|
|
11.8
|
|
1.7
|
|
6.9
|
8.5
|
7.8
|
8.8
|
8.7
|
|
|
Public
|
18.2
|
|
9.1
|
|
11.1
|
|
6.7
|
|
12.1
|
9.9
|
13.1
|
11.8
|
10.9
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports of goods and services
|
-17.5
|
|
9.2
|
|
29.4
|
|
10.6
|
|
12.4
|
3.9
|
5.8
|
5.2
|
8.6
|
|
|
Imports of goods and services
|
-11.4
|
|
15.3
|
|
31.2
|
|
-2.6
|
|
4.0
|
7.2
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices(annual percent change)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDP Deflator
|
3.8
|
|
4.1
|
|
5.0
|
|
5.4
|
|
6.4
|
5.5
|
5.2
|
5.5
|
5.3
|
|
|
CPI inflation (annual average)
|
5.6
|
|
5.6
|
|
6.1
|
|
9.0
|
|
7.9
|
6.8
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
|
|
CPI inflation (end of period)
|
6.0
|
|
5.6
|
|
7.6
|
|
9.7
|
|
7.2
|
5.8
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central government operations (in
percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue and grants
|
8.5
|
|
9.4
|
|
8.9
|
|
8.3
|
|
8.8
|
9.3
|
9.9
|
10.0
|
10.2
|
|
|
Of which: tax revenue
|
7.0
|
|
7.6
|
|
8.0
|
|
7.4
|
|
7.9
|
8.4
|
9.1
|
9.2
|
9.4
|
|
|
Total expenditure
|
13.3
|
|
13.0
|
|
13.0
|
|
12.9
|
|
13.4
|
13.9
|
14.9
|
15.0
|
15.1
|
|
|
Of which: Annual Development
Program (ADP)
|
4.9
|
|
4.5
|
|
4.7
|
|
4.3
|
|
4.7
|
5.1
|
5.9
|
5.9
|
6.2
|
|
|
Overall balance (including grants)
|
-4.8
|
|
-3.6
|
|
-4.1
|
|
-4.6
|
|
-4.6
|
-4.6
|
-5.0
|
-5.0
|
-5.0
|
|
|
(excluding grants)
|
-4.9
|
|
-3.7
|
|
-4.2
|
|
-4.7
|
|
-4.7
|
-4.7
|
-5.1
|
-5.0
|
-5.0
|
|
|
Primary balance (including grants)
|
-3.0
|
|
-1.6
|
|
-2.1
|
|
-2.6
|
|
-2.8
|
-2.3
|
-2.5
|
-2.5
|
-2.5
|
|
|
Public sector total debt 2/
|
34.5
|
|
35.6
|
|
37.9
|
|
39.8
|
|
41.4
|
42.0
|
42.7
|
42.9
|
43.1
|
|
|
Of which: External debt
|
14.6
|
|
15.1
|
|
15.4
|
|
17.7
|
|
18.1
|
18.1
|
17.9
|
17.4
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Payments(in percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current account balance
|
-1.5
|
|
-1.1
|
|
-4.1
|
|
-0.7
|
|
-0.8
|
-2.7
|
-3.0
|
-3.0
|
-3.0
|
|
|
Trade balance
|
-5.4
|
|
-6.4
|
|
-8.0
|
|
-5.8
|
|
-4.9
|
-6.7
|
-6.8
|
-6.6
|
-6.6
|
|
|
Service balance
|
-0.7
|
|
-0.7
|
|
-0.9
|
|
-1.0
|
|
-1.0
|
-1.3
|
-1.3
|
-1.2
|
-1.2
|
|
|
Income balance
|
-0.8
|
|
-0.8
|
|
-0.7
|
|
-0.9
|
|
-0.8
|
-0.9
|
-0.9
|
-0.9
|
-0.8
|
|
|
Transfers
|
5.0
|
|
6.1
|
|
4.7
|
|
5.0
|
|
4.9
|
4.8
|
4.6
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
|
|
Of which: Remittances
|
4.9
|
|
6.0
|
|
4.6
|
|
4.8
|
|
4.8
|
4.7
|
4.5
|
4.3
|
4.3
|
|
|
Capital account balance
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.0
|
|
0.1
|
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|
|
Financial account balance
|
2.3
|
|
3.4
|
|
3.4
|
|
-0.5
|
|
0.5
|
4.0
|
4.6
|
4.2
|
4.2
|
|
|
Foreign direct investment, net
|
0.3
|
|
0.3
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.4
|
|
0.4
|
0.9
|
1.1
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
|
|
Gross international reserves (billions
of U.S. dollars)
|
36.0
|
|
46.4
|
|
33.4
|
|
24.8
|
|
24.3
|
30.6
|
39.2
|
46.1
|
54.3
|
|
|
In months of next year’s imports
|
6.1
|
|
5.8
|
|
4.9
|
|
3.4
|
|
2.8
|
3.2
|
3.8
|
4.0
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money and credit(in percent of GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve money
|
8.9
|
|
9.8
|
|
8.7
|
|
8.6
|
|
8.5
|
8.5
|
8.6
|
8.7
|
8.8
|
|
|
Broad money (M2)
|
53.8
|
|
54.6
|
|
52.9
|
|
51.3
|
|
50.7
|
51.3
|
51.8
|
53.0
|
54.2
|
|
|
Credit to private sector
|
37.3
|
|
36.2
|
|
36.6
|
|
35.7
|
|
35.2
|
35.8
|
36.4
|
36.9
|
37.6
|
|
|
Credit to private sector (percent
change)
|
7.7
|
|
8.2
|
|
13.7
|
|
9.1
|
|
11.2
|
14.3
|
14.3
|
14.9
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and Investment(in percent of
GDP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross national savings
|
31.4
|
|
30.8
|
|
29.3
|
|
30.2
|
|
30.4
|
29.5
|
29.9
|
30.7
|
31.3
|
|
|
Public
|
1.0
|
|
1.9
|
|
1.2
|
|
0.3
|
|
0.6
|
1.1
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
2.1
|
|
|
Private
|
30.4
|
|
28.9
|
|
28.2
|
|
30.0
|
|
29.8
|
28.4
|
28.2
|
28.8
|
29.3
|
|
|
Gross investment
|
31.3
|
|
31.0
|
|
32.0
|
|
31.3
|
|
31.2
|
32.3
|
33.0
|
33.7
|
34.3
|
|
|
Public
|
7.3
|
|
7.3
|
|
7.5
|
|
7.6
|
|
7.9
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
9.0
|
9.3
|
|
|
Private
|
24.0
|
|
23.7
|
|
24.5
|
|
23.6
|
|
23.3
|
24.0
|
24.4
|
24.8
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memorandum items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GDP (in billions of Taka)
|
31,705
|
|
35,302
|
|
39,717
|
|
44,393
|
|
50,068
|
56,297
|
63,414
|
71,694
|
80,816
|
|
|
Sources: Bangladesh authorities; and IMF
staff estimates and projections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/ Fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends
on June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/ Includes central government's gross debt, including
debt owed to the IMF, plus domestic bank borrowing by
nonfinancial public sector and public enterprises'
external borrowing supported by government guarantees,
including short-term oil-related suppliers' credits.
|
[1]
Under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds
bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team
visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and
discusses with officials the country's economic developments and
policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report,
which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.
[2]
SDR figures for the disbursed are converted at the market rate of
U.S. dollar per SDR on the day of the Board approval.
[3]
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as
Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors,
and this summary is transmitted to the country's authorities. An
explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here:
http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm
.